Hydaelyn Role-Players
Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Printable Version

+- Hydaelyn Role-Players (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18)
+-- Forum: Final Fantasy 14 (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+--- Forum: FFXIV Discussion (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) (/showthread.php?tid=16360)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Warren Castille - 06-08-2016

So, that main story, huh? Pretty thrilling at the end. Once I disembarked the roller coaster of feels and turns, though, I was left thinking: Now that Ishgard's a republic and the landscape of the political field has changed, what now?

Nobles
The new ruling body composed of both common-bred and noble-born mucks up an awful lot of the political scheming and bloodline hostilities, especially now that it seems chairs are elected.

Inquisitors
Do they even exist anymore? The Church's heavy-handed means to keeping Ishgard devout has been presumably abolished in the wake of the revelations of the MSQ, and again that new government thing probably isn't too keen on torturing people for being friends with their new allies.

Dragoons, capital-D
An elite team of dragon-killing soldiers who are aligned now aligned with their enemies. Until we've been given a clear idea of what happened to Niddy's brood (MSQ just says "they've scattered" it's uncertain what's going to happen to our bluepurple buddies.

So anybody's RP turned upside down from this last patch? It's the first time we've seen giant changes to the landscape since ARR, really, and I'm wondering how people are going to go with the flow.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Teadrinker - 06-08-2016

....I just want my damn Alpine Dress.

Hey, Alpine Coat that's great.

*looks around*

......

.........

OH WE LADIES DON'T GET ONE DO WE. Frustrated

------------------


Show Content



RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Unnamed Mercenary - 06-08-2016

We all saw that face the PLD of Darkness made. He wants those balls dragon eyes.

Now that WoL has the Echo and Hydaelyn's Blessing and the Crystals of Light and a fucking dragon eye, it only seems fair that the Warrior of Darkness go pick up what they didn't destroy. Nidhogg might be dead, but his eyes were poorly disposed of. The moment they were tossed off the bridge, I went "well, these are going to come back later because someone's just going to go pick them up...."

All the while during the speeches, the only thing I could really think of was "so they're trying to turn Ishgard into something like the USA. Because we all know that people are totally able to separate objective law from subjective religion." I fully expect that the republic is going to bite them in the ass, but Ishgard won't be our main focus anymore. It's time the Shroud got some love seeing how we had Leviathan in Limsa and the Sultana in Ul'dah to make those cities feel special.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Warren Castille - 06-08-2016

Something that I've been mentally chewing on since I saw it, but it unrelated to Ishgard itself:

We watch Lucia block a stream of fire with her shield, which sends her back dramatically but leaves her unharmed. Lucia's a pure-blooded Garlean with a third eye. That means she can't channel aether. THAT means that "ordinary" people can definitely do things at a higher power level: Her sword also shoots off big bursts of energy during the Steps battle.

Seems pretty concrete to me that the "baseline" of power is higher than Earth-Mortal standards!


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Virella - 06-08-2016

House of Commons and House of Lords works so well in real life politics... Nice idea, but I suspect it be a dramalama affair for Ishgard as well Tongue If anything, I more reminded me of the UK and not so much the US, seeming the UK literally has the house of commons/lords. Then again, I know fuck all about US politics.

But yeah, on paper we got a nice ending!


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Warren Castille - 06-08-2016

(06-08-2016, 10:24 AM)Virella Wrote: House of Commons and House of Lords works so well in real life politics... Nice idea, but I suspect it be a dramalama affair for Ishgard as well Tongue If anything, I more reminded me of the UK and not so much the US, seeming the UK literally has the house of commons/lords. Then again, I know fuck all about US politics.

But yeah, on paper we got a nice ending!

Yeah, I don't think it'll be buttery-smooth going forward but it's a vastly different lay of the land compared to "He likes dragons, get 'em!" It puts anyone who had a core concept related to the Church or the nobility in a very tumultuous position.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Caspar - 06-08-2016

(06-08-2016, 09:51 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: Something that I've been mentally chewing on since I saw it, but it unrelated to Ishgard itself:

We watch Lucia block a stream of fire with her shield, which sends her back dramatically but leaves her unharmed. Lucia's a pure-blooded Garlean with a third eye. That means she can't channel aether. THAT means that "ordinary" people can definitely do things at a higher power level: Her sword also shoots off big bursts of energy during the Steps battle.

Seems pretty concrete to me that the "baseline" of power is higher than Earth-Mortal standards!
Tch. You beat me to it. It's as if you knew I'd comment on it, lol.

No need for this any more.

*Tosses icameheretolaughatyou.jpg*

I actually had some difficulty initially taking the scene seriously when Lucia one shot three dragons in a row. I had figured she was strong, but I thought a Garlean with no aether whatsoever would be more, I dunno, clever about it? I tended to think battle armor was their equalizer with the supernatural. But that was admittedly quickly submerged in the spectacle.

Take note that average Temple Knights blocked draconic fire with their shield first in that cutscene too, IIRC. These are normal, non-special elite mooks. The dragons still made quick work of them, but they're still capable of some pretty outrageous stuff.

I think Niddhogr's brood scattering is probably a convenient reason for why you can still fight dragons randomly in overworld areas. It feels like that kind of plot element, but at least it can allow Dragoons to still have function in their original intended role.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Warren Castille - 06-08-2016

Yeah, it's sort of a mess for determining what's "real." Cutscene Temple Knights block fire and kill dragons. Rank-and-file Brass Blades get thrown dozens of feet by Amalja'a punching. NPC guards die to FATE trash spawns. The no-aether lady shoots sword lasers like this is a Zelda game.

Shit's all over the place.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Telluride - 06-08-2016

(06-08-2016, 09:51 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: Something that I've been mentally chewing on since I saw it, but it unrelated to Ishgard itself:

We watch Lucia block a stream of fire with her shield, which sends her back dramatically but leaves her unharmed. Lucia's a pure-blooded Garlean with a third eye. That means she can't channel aether. THAT means that "ordinary" people can definitely do things at a higher power level: Her sword also shoots off big bursts of energy during the Steps battle.

Seems pretty concrete to me that the "baseline" of power is higher than Earth-Mortal standards!

Could be that she's got some high-quality equipment that has its own infusion of aether. It would be appropriate for Lucia, of all people in Ishgard, to have it. After all, the lack of jumping dragoons and godlike powers in that cutscene indicate that the loss of the Knights Twelve hasn't exactly been addressed yet, not that we ever actually saw those guys doing much of anything useful besides hassling the WoL's buddies and being Thordan's personal guard.

Could also be that the Storyboard team and the Lore team missed their lunch dates and weren't exactly in tune with each other.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Unnamed Mercenary - 06-08-2016

Well it is a fantasy setting. Their baseline for "normal" could still be wildly different than ours.

I mean, they cook with crystals! Think about that for a moment. See that sandwich? I took raw ingredients and shoved a bunch of crystals and aether at it and then -poof-. It was done.

It's possible Lucia could secretely be loading up with Garlean tech hidden underneath her armor. It's also possible that the Ishgardians figured out how to make weaponry and shields that are optimized for fighting dragons. Or maybe magical aetherial dragon fire isn't quite the same as using matches?


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Simeon Sibaruse - 06-08-2016

Erf... as much as I like the changes in Ishgard I can agree than the Garlean sidekick one shooting three dragons in a row was... puzzling. But on the other hands, you got at the same scene three Temple-Knights obviously struggling against a single wyrm, and a freaking lot of death...

So I guess it's easy to tag <Garlean Sidekick> as one of those character wearing <Plot Armour> and <Unyielding Strength> for the sake of badass cinematics and to distinguish them as important character. Hardly someone to take as a barometer for the random peon no?


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Caspar - 06-08-2016

(06-08-2016, 10:58 AM)Unnamed Mercenary Wrote: Well it is a fantasy setting. Their baseline for "normal" could still be wildly different than ours.

I mean, they cook with crystals! Think about that for a moment. See that sandwich? I took raw ingredients and shoved a bunch of crystals and aether at it and then -poof-. It was done.

It's possible Lucia could secretely be loading up with Garlean tech hidden underneath her armor. It's also possible that the Ishgardians figured out how to make weaponry and shields that are optimized for fighting dragons. Or maybe magical aetherial dragon fire isn't quite the same as using matches?
This is generally how I've seen it. I felt that the Eorzeans had to just have greater aetherical power as a baseline to even stand a chance at beating an industrial civilization that is more populous, more advanced, had better tech, and could still use magic through auxiliaries. Even the big toe of Garlemald should be able to squash them, and indeed it would have if not for the dragons, but I think with unpowered mooks the Alliance would have keeled over long before they could. Yet If it is true, having empowered regulars might not even be enough of an advantage. Punished Cred and Lucia can do these things normally.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Warren Castille - 06-08-2016

There can definitely be an argument made for "generic soldier" and named, important people with backgrounds and, you know, faces. I guess there's not anything specific to take away other than that it IS possible to do awesome things without aether, we just can't deduce HOW it is possible.

Also, SE? You and me need to have a talk about Lucia BLOCKING MAGIC. That's bullshit because I can't do it even with Bulwark OR Sheltron. :<


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Caspar - 06-08-2016

(06-08-2016, 11:17 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: There can definitely be an argument made for "generic soldier" and named, important people with backgrounds and, you know, faces. I guess there's not anything specific to take away other than that it IS possible to do awesome things without aether, we just can't deduce HOW it is possible.

Also, SE? You and me need to have a talk about Lucia BLOCKING MAGIC. That's bullshit because I can't do it even with Bulwark OR Sheltron. :<
Even random temple knights could do this, which is even more crazy. Hell if you observe in the cutscene a few are soloing dragons as if it were a medieval battle and they were all separating into separate duels. They ultimately lose, but just being able to survive even without force of numbers for more than a few seconds against a monster with magic breath and armor piercing fangs is kinda beyond most humans IRL I think.


RE: Ishgard, post 3.3 (OBVIOUSLY SPOILERS FOR MSQ) - Warren Castille - 06-08-2016

(06-08-2016, 11:21 AM)Caspar Wrote:
(06-08-2016, 11:17 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: There can definitely be an argument made for "generic soldier" and named, important people with backgrounds and, you know, faces. I guess there's not anything specific to take away other than that it IS possible to do awesome things without aether, we just can't deduce HOW it is possible.

Also, SE? You and me need to have a talk about Lucia BLOCKING MAGIC. That's bullshit because I can't do it even with Bulwark OR Sheltron. :<
Even random temple knights could do this, which is even more crazy. Hell if you observe in the cutscene a few are soloing dragons as if it were a medieval battle and they were all separating into separate duels. They ultimately lose, but just being able to survive even without force of numbers for more than a few seconds against a monster with magic breath and armor piercing fangs is kinda beyond most humans IRL I think.

It is, but we also can't really tell if Templars are specifically armed or armored to be able to handle dragons. The game never says explicitly one way or not how it works, so it's either specialized equipment that allowed them to not melt immediately or it's one more discrepancy in the list of things people can or can not do. Lucia's actions further muddy the waters.

I think SE's just fucking with us.