I wanted to bring up how the scales look so out of place on that smooth skin, and it hit me - there really should be more of a gradient between 'regular skin' and 'hard scales', with the scaly parts gradually growing finer until they dissipate into the skin instead of ending on a hard line.
As it is, they look like cosplay additions or something along those lines, not a natural part of their bodies.
That doesn't change anything at all about what I've said about underserved markets and the like.
As it is, they look like cosplay additions or something along those lines, not a natural part of their bodies.
(12-23-2014, 03:45 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: Yes, I'm the one bringing ideology into this discussion. Still no rebuttal, though, I see. If you missed my point, it was nestled directly in between the parts of my post you deigned to reply to.There's nothing to respond to. Of course SE has metrics. If this all works out for them then, wonderful, good for them.
That doesn't change anything at all about what I've said about underserved markets and the like.
(12-23-2014, 03:49 PM)Aldotsk Wrote: Does everyone remember when 1.0, people complained that nothing new was being added, but now we are complaining about how new stuffs are being added because of how they look?They're not free. You're paying for them. Remember that.
I surely wanted a pony for Christmas, but Santa gave me a box of candy canes. At least the thought counts and I am damn satisfied. Candies for life.
(12-23-2014, 03:57 PM)Ashren Snow Wrote:Sure, the data has proven otherwise and I will own up to it. There's still a significant number of votes saying they should be more bestial, however, so I would think that that's an avenue worth pursuing (even just making scaled skin a character creation option would go a long, loooong way).(12-23-2014, 02:46 PM)Zyrusticae Wrote: For the record, assuming there are actually 2 million subscribers (there aren't, but there's no point being a stickler on this), you only need about 384 people to have a confidence level of 95(+/-5)%. Hell, for 95(+/-10)% you only need 96 people. Not that difficult.
I know I said I wasn't going to post in this thread anymore, but I just wanted to come in and point out how for as much as you want to try to make it seem like everyone on the internet hates the Au Ra based on your own cursory scan of posts and comments online (which you probably only went about looking for the negative ones anyways because they share your views), your own poll proves otherwise as the top two choices are "I like them" and "they're perfect."