See, this is what doesn't make any sense to me. Basically what you're saying is that if I were in a FC that was RP and PvE oriented I'd effectively have to pick one or the other, because for whatever reason you can't balance both within a single entity. But if I were to split that, make an RP LS, and a PvE FC, somehow managing two different groups makes it easier to balance? How does that logic make any sense at all?
At least with a dualistic FC you have the benefit of insuring that everyone progresses together, where as if you split it so RP is in LS and PvE is in FC, you run the risk of being left behind and replaced if you give priority to RP over PvE. Ultimately it doesn't make sense why you would need to keep the two separated from one another if you were going to split your focus anyways.
At least with a dualistic FC you have the benefit of insuring that everyone progresses together, where as if you split it so RP is in LS and PvE is in FC, you run the risk of being left behind and replaced if you give priority to RP over PvE. Ultimately it doesn't make sense why you would need to keep the two separated from one another if you were going to split your focus anyways.