Hydaelyn Role-Players
Gender roles - Printable Version

+- Hydaelyn Role-Players (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18)
+-- Forum: Final Fantasy 14 (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+--- Forum: FFXIV Discussion (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: Gender roles (/showthread.php?tid=7486)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


RE: Gender roles - Kage - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 04:26 PM)Gaspard Wrote:
(07-24-2014, 04:20 PM)ExKage Wrote: I... we just had a several page or posts-worth of discussion that snowballed...

because Seekers -aren't- governed by Nunhs typically. It's in the lore that
Quote:"Nunh status does not equate to leadership within a tribe, and in fact, very few nunh ever become leaders."

This is not mean to derail but... just because lore says that Keepers are Matriarchal does not mean that Seekers are Patriarchal.

Oh, right. I forgot that detail. Nunh status was only related to breeding rights right?
Pretty much. I'm pretty sure most peoples' conception of Nunh and Seeker tribes is because of the U tribe.


RE: Gender roles - McBeefâ„¢ - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 04:28 PM)Aerghwab Wrote: Amalj'aa sound like dwarves. In certain dwarven subraces, it's extremely common for both males and females to grow long, luxurious beards. As you can imagine, this is sometimes very confusing. For this reason, the dwarves of old instituted the annual Lifting of the Beards festival. The subterranean dwarves dance naked beneath the light of torches, there are literally days and days of revelry of the sort in which only dwarves are rowdy enough to partake. During this most sacred of gyrations, the dwarves lift their beards to display the heretofore concealed portions of their anatomies to their dance partners. If said partner is pleased with what they see, well - you can guess at the rest. Smile

I may have made that whole thing up just now, but that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

I would lift your beard, if you know what I mean.


RE: Gender roles - Zyrusticae - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 04:27 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: I'm 99% sure that line is meant to reference the fact that we're doing an impossible task outside of a video game. Not everything in the game is meant to be taken at face value.
Considering all the seemingly impossible things the PC does over the course of the main story alone, I'm not so certain about this.


RE: Gender roles - Warren Castille - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 04:39 PM)Zyrusticae Wrote:
(07-24-2014, 04:27 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: I'm 99% sure that line is meant to reference the fact that we're doing an impossible task outside of a video game. Not everything in the game is meant to be taken at face value.
Considering all the seemingly impossible things the PC does over the course of the main story alone, I'm not so certain about this.

You're taking the single-player mindset of the Chosen One and applying it to the entire population, though. Not everything as it appears in game is a direct, literal effect on the world. When you're carrying corpses for a main story quest, they're represented in your key items as flowers, and you carry several at once. I don't think they actually turned into flowers for you to sprint full speed with.

This is a matter of opinion, though. I just think the local team was having fun with the language and leaning on the fourth wall a bit.


RE: Gender roles - McBeefâ„¢ - 07-24-2014

Well, there are two ways of looking at it.

The fact remains that Lalafells and Roe's are shown to be roughly equal physically speaking. Otherwise no one would ever make a lalafell a brass blade, and papashan wouldn't be the hero of the sultansworn. So clearly a person can be roughly on par with someone 4 to 5 times their height and bodymass.

So either A: Roe's have the worst muscle density ever, and lalafells have the best.

Or B: Physical musculature is only a part of strength, and everyone, even fighters use aether to reinforce their actions.

I think option B is more plausible. Not everyone may be aware they're doing it, but they probably are.

The only flaw in this plan is that Garleans can't channel aether at all, so theoretically they'd be weaker in combat than most eorzeans. Maybe that's why the pureblooded garleans you see are all buff dudes. GOTTA COMPENSATE.


RE: Gender roles - FreelanceWizard - 07-24-2014

At the risk of further derailing the thread...

(07-24-2014, 04:20 PM)ExKage Wrote: This is not mean to derail but... just because lore says that Keepers are Matriarchal does not mean that Seekers are Patriarchal.

I believe the stance that Seekers are patriarchal comes several dev posts (excluding the whole Drake tribe thing), but most directly from the naming conventions post, which says: "Unlike the Seekers of the Sun, the Keepers of the Moon is a highly matriarchal society(...)" (emphasis mine). There's a fair amount of other dev post evidence as well (Seeker females follow a male to new territories or who can win new territory for the tribe, Seeker females use their father's name as their surname, etc.).

Of course, with the way the Seeker lore is written with regards to territories, one can pretty much write one's territory however works best for the character.


RE: Gender roles - Melkire - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 04:52 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: Well, there are two ways of looking at it.

The fact remains that Lalafells and Roe's are shown to be roughly equal physically speaking. Otherwise no one would ever make a lalafell a brass blade, and papashan wouldn't be the hero of the sultansworn. So clearly a person can be roughly on par with someone 4 to 5 times their height and bodymass.

So either A: Roe's have the worst muscle density ever, and lalafells have the best.

Or B: Physical musculature is only a part of strength, and everyone, even fighters use aether to reinforce their actions.

I think option B is more plausible. Not everyone may be aware they're doing it, but they probably are.

The only flaw in this plan is that Garleans can't channel aether at all, so theoretically they'd be weaker in combat than most eorzeans. Maybe that's why the pureblooded garleans you see are all buff dudes. GOTTA COMPENSATE.

Garleans also get by due to their tech. Their overreliance on such likely stems from their inability (or poor ability, I'm not familiar with their lore) to channel aether.


RE: Gender roles - Warren Castille - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 04:52 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: Well, there are two ways of looking at it.

The fact remains that Lalafells and Roe's are shown to be roughly equal physically speaking. Otherwise no one would ever make a lalafell a brass blade, and papashan wouldn't be the hero of the sultansworn. So clearly a person can be roughly on par with someone 4 to 5 times their height and bodymass.

So either A: Roe's have the worst muscle density ever, and lalafells have the best.

Or B: Physical musculature is only a part of strength, and everyone, even fighters use aether to reinforce their actions.

I think option B is more plausible. Not everyone may be aware they're doing it, but they probably are.

The only flaw in this plan is that Garleans can't channel aether at all, so theoretically they'd be weaker in combat than most eorzeans. Maybe that's why the pureblooded garleans you see are all buff dudes. GOTTA COMPENSATE.

There's a third option. Maybe Papashan's just developed enough technique to overcompensate for his size? Relying on agility and being entire magnitudes smaller than your foe is a valid tactic, as is letting them think you're going to go down easily. If it was so simple to just be aetherially reinforced, there'd never be any reason for people to have sculpted bodies or actually try; Magic is just making us better. Having everyone on the planet be functionally equal because reasons feels like a cop-out to me. Having those who are able to hang with the bigger/smaller/faster/stronger/magical folk through experience and effort is what makes them heroes (or villains!) in the first place. Handwaving it away with magic makes for poor storytelling.

"I overcame Ultima weapon thanks to crystal-steroids! Thanks, Mothercrystal!"


RE: Gender roles - Melkire - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 05:03 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: "I overcame Ultima weapon thanks to crystal-steroids! Thanks, Mothercrystal!"

What is the Echo mechanic? I'll take Things Melkire Hates for $1000, Alex.


RE: Gender roles - Naunet - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 05:03 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: There's a third option. Maybe Papashan's just developed enough technique to overcompensate for his size? Relying on agility and being entire magnitudes smaller than your foe is a valid tactic, as is letting them think you're going to go down easily. If it was so simple to just be aetherially reinforced, there'd never be any reason for people to have sculpted bodies or actually try; Magic is just making us better. Having everyone on the planet be functionally equal because reasons feels like a cop-out to me. Having those who are able to hang with the bigger/smaller/faster/stronger/magical folk through experience and effort is what makes them heroes (or villains!) in the first place. Handwaving it away with magic makes for poor storytelling.

"I overcame Ultima weapon thanks to crystal-steroids! Thanks, Mothercrystal!"

This has strayed so far from the OP, but... I agree with this post so much. xD


RE: Gender roles - McBeefâ„¢ - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 05:03 PM)Warren Castille Wrote:
(07-24-2014, 04:52 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: Well, there are two ways of looking at it.

The fact remains that Lalafells and Roe's are shown to be roughly equal physically speaking. Otherwise no one would ever make a lalafell a brass blade, and papashan wouldn't be the hero of the sultansworn. So clearly a person can be roughly on par with someone 4 to 5 times their height and bodymass.

So either A: Roe's have the worst muscle density ever, and lalafells have the best.

Or B: Physical musculature is only a part of strength, and everyone, even fighters use aether to reinforce their actions.

I think option B is more plausible. Not everyone may be aware they're doing it, but they probably are.

The only flaw in this plan is that Garleans can't channel aether at all, so theoretically they'd be weaker in combat than most eorzeans. Maybe that's why the pureblooded garleans you see are all buff dudes. GOTTA COMPENSATE.

There's a third option. Maybe Papashan's just developed enough technique to overcompensate for his size? Relying on agility and being entire magnitudes smaller than your foe is a valid tactic, as is letting them think you're going to go down easily. If it was so simple to just be aetherially reinforced, there'd never be any reason for people to have sculpted bodies or actually try; Magic is just making us better. Having everyone on the planet be functionally equal because reasons feels like a cop-out to me. Having those who are able to hang with the bigger/smaller/faster/stronger/magical folk through experience and effort is what makes them heroes (or villains!) in the first place. Handwaving it away with magic makes for poor storytelling.

"I overcame Ultima weapon thanks to crystal-steroids! Thanks, Mothercrystal!"

The problem is that there is no way someone with that body size could do the things they're supposed to do. Also People seem to think smaller = faster, but in reality it's the opposite. More strength means more speed.

Also it's not really a cop out, the physical training people do probably helps their bodies use it. I keep going back to dragon ball analogies. Goku does all the training as a kid, but never gets stronger in any physically determinable sense. No one does, they always look the same. But the training makes them better able to use their ki.

FFXIV is a dragonball type world, where your physical strength is just the baseboard, and you can train above and beyond what your body should physically be able to do. In dragonball the reason is energy and crap, in FFXIV it's aether.

So no lalafells aren't born as strong as Roes, but they can work hard and eventually be as strong as one. Think of ather powers like muscles that can be built upon once your body already has all the muscles it's going to get.


RE: Gender roles - Zyrusticae - 07-24-2014

Well, you know. It can be both. With aether allowing people to make up for their shortcomings, while also allowing people to put emphasis on their already-great strengths. Perhaps size is a deterrent when it comes to fine control (actually, I know this for a fact to be true when it comes to motor control) and hence Lalafell (and Miqo'te to a lesser extent) have a natural advantage here, while Roegadyn and Highlanders have to put forth a little bit more effort to do the same.

Either way, aether is a thing, and I still posit it is one of the reasons (if not THE reason) gender equality is a thing in Eorzea. Without it, well, you'd hear no end to the debates about female physical strength and blah blah blah, you know the drill.

(07-24-2014, 04:55 PM)Melkire Wrote: Garleans also get by due to their tech. Their overreliance on such likely stems from their inability (or poor ability, I'm not familiar with their lore) to channel aether.
It's less that they lack the ability (because all living things have at least some aether) and more that their homeland being so dearth of aether means they don't really have any opportunity to practice at it.

But yeah, Garleans are pretty weak without their technology to back them up. Good for them, then, that their technology is effectively decades ahead of everyone else's (Garlond Ironworks aside).


RE: Gender roles - Unnamed Mercenary - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 05:15 PM)Zyrusticae Wrote: Well, you know. It can be both. With aether allowing people to make up for their shortcomings, while also allowing people to put emphasis on their already-great strengths. Perhaps size is a deterrent when it comes to fine control (actually, I know this for a fact to be true when it comes to motor control) and hence Lalafell (and Miqo'te to a lesser extent) have a natural advantage here, while Roegadyn and Highlanders have to put forth a little bit more effort to do the same.

Either way, aether is a thing, and I still posit it is one of the reasons (if not THE reason) gender equality is a thing in Eorzea. Without it, well, you'd hear no end to the debates about female physical strength and blah blah blah, you know the drill.

(07-24-2014, 04:55 PM)Melkire Wrote: Garleans also get by due to their tech. Their overreliance on such likely stems from their inability (or poor ability, I'm not familiar with their lore) to channel aether.
It's less that they lack the ability (because all living things have at least some aether) and more that their homeland being so dearth of aether means they don't really have any opportunity to practice at it.

But yeah, Garleans are pretty weak without their technology to back them up. Good for them, then, that their technology is effectively decades ahead of everyone else's (Garlond Ironworks aside).

I kinda see the Garleans as having just as much aether as any other hyur, but that they lack the ability to consciously use it. That's why in terms of abilities, they shy away from magic (one could say they have no aether reserves), but they certainly are physically weak. It just so happens that their magitek gadgets make up for the difference in their combat styles. 

I'd have expected Garleans to have slightly more defined gender roles in this sense. If we judge based off of the regular enemies, and named characters, we really only have a single Garlean female with power, with higher/equal ranking men. And all of the "regular" Garlean soldiers have always appeared to be male models and have male voices. But then, maybe they're just sending a male-only army to Eorzea. We don't have enough lore on them.


RE: Gender roles - McBeefâ„¢ - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 05:31 PM)Unnamed Mercenary Wrote: I kinda see the Garleans as having just as much aether as any other hyur, but that they lack the ability to consciously use it. That's why in terms of abilities, they shy away from magic (one could say they have no aether reserves), but they certainly are physically weak. It just so happens that their magitek gadgets make up for the difference in their combat styles. 

I'd have expected Garleans to have slightly more defined gender roles in this sense. If we judge based off of the regular enemies, and named characters, we really only have a single Garlean female with power, with higher/equal ranking men. And all of the "regular" Garlean soldiers have always appeared to be male models and have male voices. But then, maybe they're just sending a male-only army to Eorzea. We don't have enough lore on them.

This is a really interesting point, and it ties into what Zyrusticae said. Why are all the garleans but one male? I can't think we can just blame developer laziness, since every other fighting organization in Eorzea has a good mix of men and women. It seems likely it's a conscious choice then. If so, then Merc might be right, if a society had no ability to channel aether, odds are they would develop in a patriarchical, men in charge way. That is the way the vast majority of civilizations have developed in our own world. Now that Garlemald has expanded, they might have adopted the gender roles they've traditionally used for their empire. So except in rare cases, they only send men to fight in wars.

In Eorzea, if we assume Aether can allow one to make up for certain physical aspects, like males generally being taller and having more muscle mass, Not to mention that a thaumaturge or conjurer would be extremely powerful regardgless of gender. We can see how an egalitarian society might form.

If the developers really did go that far in their lore and world building it would be pretty cool.


RE: Gender roles - Naunet - 07-24-2014

(07-24-2014, 05:15 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: FFXIV is a dragonball type world

I can buy this. It has an explanation behind it that's more than just "lol cuz magicz".