Hey all,
A conversation amongst linkshell mates came up recently,regarding how we define “heavy RP,†which when one thinks about it, is a very broad term, and because of that, can mean very different things for different people, which creates some confusion regarding what a shell is really saying about itself when it tags itself as being ‘heavy RP.’ Consider the following fictional roleplayers,modeled after people I know personally:
Roleplayer A: A is amember of an RPLS, which strives for 100% immersion. In this shell, A is always in-character asper the shell requirements. They log inon a daily basis, don’t carry a particular interest in end-game and aren’t too concerned with in-game advancement at all.Â
They do a lot of writings, mostly in journals, etc. They pretty much main their roleplay linkshelland attend every event that comes up.Â
Their punctuation may not be perfect all the time, but its readable andthey are still able to convey emotion fairly.
Roleplayer B: B isvery interested in roleplay, and has a lot of time constraints, due to their work/school/other factors. Logging ontothe game once a day to RP really isn’t an option at all for them. They are often tired due to their real life restrictions,so they may get on for a few hours a couple days a week. They are in a shell that caters to this,which sets up RP events that most of the members can attend at a given time. B puts a lot of effort into the RP when theycan go, has years worth of plots planned and frequently does some forum RP whenever they have a chance. They getreally involved in their story and would love to RP more; unfortunately, real life makes that tough.
Roleplayer C: C hasmoderate attendance in their roleplay linkshell. C butts heads with other roleplayers outsideof their linkshell somewhat frequently because they take some liberties in interpreting the lore. Thankfully, theyhave a linkshell that caters to that. Inthis linkshell, the restrictions on lore are relatively lax, but good storytelling is required. When C takesliberties with the lore, they do so with the hope of creating a compelling plotline that will bring enjoyment to their shellmates… even if it includes vampiric wyrm/demon triple breeds.
In all of the cases above, I see different examples of whatI would consider a “Heavy RPer.â€Â A showsit through their attendance and regular participation in their shell’s events. B shows it with the dedicationto making RP a priority even in their busy life, and putting a lot of deep thought into their plots and making the most out of the time that they do get for RP. C shows it through their truedrive to tell compelling stories without focusing too much on the lore boundaries.
There are several aspects that I think come to mind when Ithink of heavy RP, which includes:
Time Commitment: Flexible
Degree of Immersion:Â
Linkshell is 100% in-character only
Form and Rules:Â Seesite rules for RP notation; high level of punctuation preferred.
Recruitment: Open
Focus on Lore: Very high
I think that the example above conveys a better picture ofthe shell and what it is seeking, and gives the linkshell seeker a better idea on what would be expected from them at a quick glance than ‘heavy RP’ would. Biggest thing someone might takefrom this specific example is the ‘Flexible’ part. A lot of people associate roleplay linkshellsas being a significant time sink that they may not have time for. Hence it can be somewhat intimidating, orthey don’t want to commit to something so quick. But despite the strictness in other areas ofthis particular shell example, the open recruitment and flexible time commitment might make them feel more comfortable easing in.
I also think we may want to try and not use ‘casual’ as thekey word for less strict RP. Reasonbeing is that casual carries with it a connotation of ‘not serious,’ and I’m pretty sure anyone who would visit this site is serious about RP to some degree. Something more along the linesof ‘flexible’ phrases it better.
What do you all think?Â
Guess I’ll stop here to collect some thoughts.
A conversation amongst linkshell mates came up recently,regarding how we define “heavy RP,†which when one thinks about it, is a very broad term, and because of that, can mean very different things for different people, which creates some confusion regarding what a shell is really saying about itself when it tags itself as being ‘heavy RP.’ Consider the following fictional roleplayers,modeled after people I know personally:
Roleplayer A: A is amember of an RPLS, which strives for 100% immersion. In this shell, A is always in-character asper the shell requirements. They log inon a daily basis, don’t carry a particular interest in end-game and aren’t too concerned with in-game advancement at all.Â
They do a lot of writings, mostly in journals, etc. They pretty much main their roleplay linkshelland attend every event that comes up.Â
Their punctuation may not be perfect all the time, but its readable andthey are still able to convey emotion fairly.
Roleplayer B: B isvery interested in roleplay, and has a lot of time constraints, due to their work/school/other factors. Logging ontothe game once a day to RP really isn’t an option at all for them. They are often tired due to their real life restrictions,so they may get on for a few hours a couple days a week. They are in a shell that caters to this,which sets up RP events that most of the members can attend at a given time. B puts a lot of effort into the RP when theycan go, has years worth of plots planned and frequently does some forum RP whenever they have a chance. They getreally involved in their story and would love to RP more; unfortunately, real life makes that tough.
Roleplayer C: C hasmoderate attendance in their roleplay linkshell. C butts heads with other roleplayers outsideof their linkshell somewhat frequently because they take some liberties in interpreting the lore. Thankfully, theyhave a linkshell that caters to that. Inthis linkshell, the restrictions on lore are relatively lax, but good storytelling is required. When C takesliberties with the lore, they do so with the hope of creating a compelling plotline that will bring enjoyment to their shellmates… even if it includes vampiric wyrm/demon triple breeds.
In all of the cases above, I see different examples of whatI would consider a “Heavy RPer.â€Â A showsit through their attendance and regular participation in their shell’s events. B shows it with the dedicationto making RP a priority even in their busy life, and putting a lot of deep thought into their plots and making the most out of the time that they do get for RP. C shows it through their truedrive to tell compelling stories without focusing too much on the lore boundaries.
There are several aspects that I think come to mind when Ithink of heavy RP, which includes:
- The levelof time commitment that is expected of an RPer
- 100% In-Character at all times
- Strict rules and guidelines that are followed todefine the linkshell’s formÂ
- Significant plot depth and detail (and how lore is treated)
Time Commitment: Flexible
Degree of Immersion:Â
Linkshell is 100% in-character only
Form and Rules:Â Seesite rules for RP notation; high level of punctuation preferred.
Recruitment: Open
Focus on Lore: Very high
I think that the example above conveys a better picture ofthe shell and what it is seeking, and gives the linkshell seeker a better idea on what would be expected from them at a quick glance than ‘heavy RP’ would. Biggest thing someone might takefrom this specific example is the ‘Flexible’ part. A lot of people associate roleplay linkshellsas being a significant time sink that they may not have time for. Hence it can be somewhat intimidating, orthey don’t want to commit to something so quick. But despite the strictness in other areas ofthis particular shell example, the open recruitment and flexible time commitment might make them feel more comfortable easing in.
I also think we may want to try and not use ‘casual’ as thekey word for less strict RP. Reasonbeing is that casual carries with it a connotation of ‘not serious,’ and I’m pretty sure anyone who would visit this site is serious about RP to some degree. Something more along the linesof ‘flexible’ phrases it better.
What do you all think?Â
Guess I’ll stop here to collect some thoughts.