(08-03-2013, 01:35 PM)Sounsyy Wrote:(08-03-2013, 12:47 PM)Merri Wrote: I honestly felt completely underwhelmed with Paladin. It just felt like it completely lacked the ability to do things, even at 50.
Warrior, on the other hand, felt like it had so much more depth to it's gameplay. I absolutely adore the wrath system. It's incredibly fun and kept me totally engaged in what I was doing. There were also so many possible chains and combos between abilities to just feel like you were an absolute powerhouse, albeit briefly.
I think the loss of Succor was a huge blow. I feel really helpless without it. Sure I can mitigate nearly all damage done against me, but I can't really do anything about it. I just have to sit there and take it like a wall. I feel like I don't really have a use for my MP pool. I have a moderately high MP pool and no spells worth casting. Also not a huge fan of Sword and Shield Oath. Maybe if they took out Sword Oath and replaced it with Succor and kept just Shield Oath this problem would be alleviated. The Shield Oath toggle spell doesn't need a counterpart. Defiance is a toggle and it works just fine solo on WAR.Â
I agree 100%. It isn't that Paladin is bad, it's just.. ..lackluster right now. I had actually been contemplating mentioning the whole shield/sword oath thing, but didn't. I totally agree with sword oath being a complete waste of a job skill spot. I mean, we only get five, and two are taken up by buffs that can't even be up at the same time. Shield oath has it's merits, but I feel like sword oath needs to just go. Succor would be a great fit there, I agree. Felt like Paladin lost some of it's "paladin"-ness without it. Sure, you can slot cure, but it doesn't really do much for you in the end.
I also think they need to just get rid of Awareness, put Cover in it's place, and give Paladin something else in it's place for it's lv.35 skill.