Drama follows anything. Don't even get me started on end game drama.
RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes
Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.
Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
|
|
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:28 PM
People have been very polite about it since 2010 though? I don't really recall people being rude to the devs, just venting frustrations on this forums which I'm sure the devs don't even read. Way back in the day, the devs got wind of us wanting an RP server and said they would think about it, but obviously went "Nah", and that's a very likely scenario this time.
Doesn't hurt to try though, just have other plans and treat them adding <RP> as a contingency. |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 03:32 PM by ArmachiA.)
(05-19-2017, 03:30 PM)Val Wrote: Oh definitely, I don't mean in the past. People have been kind. But the people raging/lashing out right now? Not only to devs, but their own server people that are offering legitimate options and opinions? Definitely not helping as much as they think they are. Yeah, it doesn't really make sense to turn on each other and rage against a non-existent machine. I keep tabs on Nero's thread and the amount of RPers turning on each other over this is startling. |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 03:39 PM by Kage.)
I don't know if people think I'm being rational, thick-headed, or ragey or not. I'm just trying to come at this with the best possible foot forward with realistic expectations.
While RP is and always has been secondary, what the community by and large decides will affect me. I am seeing, watching, and weighing in because while I have no real bias or desire towards any particular path (except I do think that consolidating -even more- on Balmung is the worst), I am interested in what will be the outcome and how it affects my friends, the communities they interact with, and myself. Would it be more likely to see a designated-by-SE RP server? Will that mean by and large Balmung's RP community leaves? Will my friends by and large leave? Balmung is locked and another community must now be the one to point to. Will people join there cause it's freer? How does this community do? What are pros and cons of everything being considered? Will people decide on another unofficial server and move en-masse with the incentives? |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 03:43 PM by Nodem.)
(05-19-2017, 03:08 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(05-19-2017, 02:25 PM)Kage Wrote: A forced split of Balmung would be a horrible fucking outcome for players. I would love to make sure this is not a world we go to.This isn't an unheard of scenario either, FFXI forced a split on it's biggest server when it got too congested. Players woke up one day on a completely different server than their I see you've been having deja-vu crica 2008 as well. The entire time I've been speaking of this, I've been having flashbacks to this event. THIS CAN HAPPEN TO US. Reopening the gates to Balmung will 100% CAUSE THIS. You'll notice a lot of this is sounding familiar too. As if it's happening now. |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:42 PM
(05-19-2017, 03:39 PM)Nodem Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:08 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(05-19-2017, 02:25 PM)Kage Wrote: A forced split of Balmung would be a horrible fucking outcome for players. I would love to make sure this is not a world we go to.This isn't an unheard of scenario either, FFXI forced a split on it's biggest server when it got too congested. Players woke up one day on a completely different server than their How did FFXI fare afterwards? Did it still do well for long periods of time? Barely a blip in the profits etc? Did it start the decline in the game? |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 03:44 PM by Nodem.)
(05-19-2017, 03:42 PM)Kage Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:39 PM)Nodem Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:08 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(05-19-2017, 02:25 PM)Kage Wrote: A forced split of Balmung would be a horrible fucking outcome for players. I would love to make sure this is not a world we go to.This isn't an unheard of scenario either, FFXI forced a split on it's biggest server when it got too congested. Players woke up one day on a completely different server than their Considering FFXI is still running, and still has subs, and has been running for 15 years now? I'd say pretty good. |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:45 PM
(05-19-2017, 03:44 PM)Nodem Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:42 PM)Kage Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:39 PM)Nodem Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:08 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(05-19-2017, 02:25 PM)Kage Wrote: A forced split of Balmung would be a horrible fucking outcome for players. I would love to make sure this is not a world we go to.This isn't an unheard of scenario either, FFXI forced a split on it's biggest server when it got too congested. Players woke up one day on a completely different server than their As far as I'm aware FFXI is shutting down? Did I hear that wrong? |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:46 PM
(05-19-2017, 03:45 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:44 PM)Nodem Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:42 PM)Kage Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:39 PM)Nodem Wrote:(05-19-2017, 03:08 PM)ArmachiA Wrote: This isn't an unheard of scenario either, FFXI forced a split on it's biggest server when it got too congested. Players woke up one day on a completely different server than their Celebrating it's 15th anniversary soon. http://www.playonline.com/ff11us/campaig...tml?b=1705 |
RE: Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread |
05-19-2017, 03:46 PM
I think we should wait to make any hard decisions about another server until we see what servers will be free to transfer too. I think that's going to help immensely, though I'm still hedging bets on Mateus, as long as there's not an influx of people going there. Granted, it would have to be a lot of people, but.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|
|
|
Users browsing this thread: 74 Guest(s)