Thread Closed
Let's take a quick recap.
As mentioned here, Nat trespassed on some grounds, character B shot 'at' her, the shot landed.
Yeah, if you fire a gun at a living thing there's no retconning. The person made the conscious choice to have his character attack another character with lethal force. This is also part of roleplaying, and part of consequence, and honestly, I love it that Nat did this.
Also, just as a reminder towards the whole 'trespassing' Idea. The use of deadly force to protect your property is 'mostly' an american thing (mind you, mostly). In most European countries if you kill somebody it doesn't matter if it was your home, the street, or under the kitchen table; If he did not assault you with the intend to kill you you have no right to use lethal force.
But I guess that'd have to be filed under 'What is Eorzean Law' trivia
As mentioned here, Nat trespassed on some grounds, character B shot 'at' her, the shot landed.
Yeah, if you fire a gun at a living thing there's no retconning. The person made the conscious choice to have his character attack another character with lethal force. This is also part of roleplaying, and part of consequence, and honestly, I love it that Nat did this.
Also, just as a reminder towards the whole 'trespassing' Idea. The use of deadly force to protect your property is 'mostly' an american thing (mind you, mostly). In most European countries if you kill somebody it doesn't matter if it was your home, the street, or under the kitchen table; If he did not assault you with the intend to kill you you have no right to use lethal force.
But I guess that'd have to be filed under 'What is Eorzean Law' trivia
![[Image: afvXOt2.png]](http://i.imgur.com/afvXOt2.png)