RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

CrookedTarot · **10-15-2014, 02:55 PM**

(10-15-2014, 01:48 PM)Titor Wrote: I do, because I have not really seen anything to counter the statement.
Every CNJ/WHM I have met ICly has been the motherly, healer, tree-hugger type.
Every MRD/WAR has been hulky brawny type.
Every THM/BLM has been the distant seemingly good but still something is off type
Every LNC/DRG has been..... ..... ..... typical drg.
Every GLD/PLD has been the protective knight type
I only met one ARC/BRD so, not much to go off there.
PUG/MNK seems to be the punchy punchy I punch your face because PUNCH type.
I have not met many other ACN's, but like my character they seem to be the smart/nerdy/bookworm type.

If your character breaks any of these patterns I have noticed, great! But I probably have not rped with you O-o

Tarot breaks the tread of the gloomy Lancer type, being more of a rogue anyway. In fact it's why I started this entire thread and discussion was mostly because I wasn't sure if people would believe he could be a 'rogue' without actually having the class.
As for being a non-gloomy lancer, he will play pretend he's gloomy with the right people.

"So we ready to go exploring--oh, wait, I'm a lancer, ah..ahem. 'Let's go'...Heh!"

But the thing is that I do stereotype for all the reasons you said, even going so far as to apply them to people I know personally. Monks/Pugs are the beefy types to be sure, though oddly I've never RPed much with Warriors. All the paladins seem to be the more 'strategic' thinkers if they aren't 'knightly'. Even then I know ONE who is neither but he's a weirdo! WEIRDO!

Allowing Class to Define Character

RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes