From a legal point of view, I can see why they would need to do this, to address this, and why it could possibly be a legal loophole if they did something like sue a RMT company of sort.
But it still sucks.
But it still sucks.
Policy change: Sales of art for gil forbidden |
|
RE: Policy change: Sales of art for gil forbidden |
02-13-2015, 02:09 AM
From a legal point of view, I can see why they would need to do this, to address this, and why it could possibly be a legal loophole if they did something like sue a RMT company of sort.
But it still sucks. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|
|
|