"YES," the Judge responded neatly. "WE ENGAGED IN CONVERSATION, WHEREIN WE BOTH HAVE EQUAL SANCTION ON THE DIRECTION OF IT. I SET A RULE, WHICH WAS WELL IN YOUR RIGHTS TO REFUTE, BUT YOU DID NOT. YOU INSTEAD BROKE THE RULE, AND RECEIVED YOUR JUST PUNISHMENT. I WOULD EXPECT THE SAME WERE THE SITUATION REVERSED."
He seemed rather unmoved by her harsh tone and insulting manner to which she spoke to him. Actually, Jredthys very clearly looked like someone who would not be moved unless he so desired it, conversationally or otherwise. So, "buggering off" was certainly not in the equation at all from his point of view. Besides, it wasn't "acting" high and mighty when he was in his perceived right as both Judge and equal participant in the conversation. It was not his fault for her not refuting the rule or setting her own.
"SO YOU MOVE TO END THIS CONVERSATION, THEN." If it was a question, it certainly wasn't worded like it. "VERY WELL, I SECOND THE MOTION. HOWEVER, I WILL REMAIN WHERE I AM. YOU ARE FREE TO RELOCATE IF YOU WISH."
He turned back towards Momodi to inquire about a second martini and perhaps even a menu, if one existed.
He seemed rather unmoved by her harsh tone and insulting manner to which she spoke to him. Actually, Jredthys very clearly looked like someone who would not be moved unless he so desired it, conversationally or otherwise. So, "buggering off" was certainly not in the equation at all from his point of view. Besides, it wasn't "acting" high and mighty when he was in his perceived right as both Judge and equal participant in the conversation. It was not his fault for her not refuting the rule or setting her own.
"SO YOU MOVE TO END THIS CONVERSATION, THEN." If it was a question, it certainly wasn't worded like it. "VERY WELL, I SECOND THE MOTION. HOWEVER, I WILL REMAIN WHERE I AM. YOU ARE FREE TO RELOCATE IF YOU WISH."
He turned back towards Momodi to inquire about a second martini and perhaps even a menu, if one existed.
~