(04-23-2015, 10:13 AM)Black Hat Wrote:(04-23-2015, 10:05 AM)Casden Reeves Wrote:Â I have 205, been a member since.....good god. Is that accurate?? -_- And my rep is right around Casden's.....I feel like that argument is invalid. If you break it down mathematically, 205 divided by 18 months is roughly 11 1/2 posts per month. Roughly 3 posts per week as an average. You have 420 since February. That's 140 a month at an average rate of 35 posts per week or 5 posts a day ( DID MATH WRONG ). So you must be more popular than me, even though I've been a member longer?(04-23-2015, 10:02 AM)Kage Wrote: Was it because I post a lot?*looks at your post count*
Yes, yes it was
I actually do believe popularity is being based on post count, and who many people reply to your posts/topics.
What a colossal waste of time and energy.
