(04-29-2015, 08:58 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:(04-29-2015, 08:33 PM)Kellach Woods Wrote:(04-29-2015, 08:07 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: I think someone should have to commit a moderate offence to be perma banned. Think of it, someone could get one a month, never have 2 at the same time, and then suddenly, 10 months later post a meme and go straight from nothing to permaban.
Said scenario should never actually occur as per the rules themselves.
Forum Rules Wrote:Warning points last for 4 weeks from the time the warning was issued.
They'd be at 2 points across all months, post a meme and that'd be their minor for the month, leaving them at either 2 or 4 points.
Yes, but there is a blanket 20 points a year = ban.
Edit: Apparently osric's post means I read that wrong.
Whoops, no, you read it right, I forgot the per-year clause. It was a late addition and it slipped my mind as a result. As Freelance said, that number 20 is under supervision and might be changed later down the line.
On a personal level, Nat, halfway there for 1/3rd of the year seems bad, but you've improved lately. Wouldn't be surprised to see that trend continue, especially in light of temp bans that will see actual use now. Having time to cool off does loads to curb bad posting habits. If you're worried about pre-existing warnings, that's something we can discuss in PMs, as I don't think we'll be counting those, only the ones from now moving forward. FW, please correct me if I'm wrong.
![[Image: 1qVSsTp.png]](http://i.imgur.com/1qVSsTp.png)
