(04-30-2015, 02:10 AM)ArmachiA Wrote: On the rest of it. Honestly, it sounds fine to me? Users with regular behavior of being disruptive is something all forums face and is something all forums need to handle. I am curious on what exactly is going to get the smack down, and as much as I would like to I certainly can't ask you to bring an old thread as an example that got closed and say who would get in trouble under the new warning so I have an understanding...I'm perfectly fine with this as well. >.> I'd love to see an old thread get dissected for the content? and/or tone of the posts. I'm not sure how hard or easy it would be to do so over PMs for multiple people...? I just figured an example made to all would be easier.
or can I? <,<
I mean the thing is, if you've accumulated so much to have made a pattern of being a disruptive presence enough to have reached a certain number, I would think you would see that there's a problem that needs addressing.
On the subject of warnings being public, I'd happily see that as well. I don't view it so much as shaming the one person or post, but it's really telling people "Hey everyone, watch it/this. This is the type of behavior we [trying to be all-inclusive] want to curb." I've wanted to suggest it earlier but I know some people do see it as shaming. I disagree with that but as it's come up I want to voice my support for it.
