
(04-30-2015, 07:24 PM)Nakoli Chalahko Wrote:(04-30-2015, 07:11 PM)Edda Wrote: I fully agree with Natalie. Especially on a site filled with RPers that tend to be hugboxing carebears, even polite dissension can be interpreted as an insult by the highly sensitive. While I do not disagree with the rules, I have hope that our moderators will not hastily perceive harsh disagreement as intentional nastiness.These rules have always been here.
From the moment you signed up to the site, the rules were there. You agreed to abide by them by registering.
I think what Edda might be trying to say is that there are people who aren't actually breaking rules but will be punished/reported anyway by because of people who are looking for reasons to be offended.
(04-30-2015, 07:31 PM)FreelanceWizard Wrote: snip snip
With that said, let's look at another example. Calling a group of people "hugboxing carebears" as a means of dismissing an argument or concern is, in fact, the sort of thing that will get a warning. That's obviously intended to provoke, it doesn't add to the discourse, and it doesn't support any point. You could easily make the exact same point without doing that.
I wonder if it's good to dismiss a concern because it wasn't worded nicely enough? Kind of seems like it is proving a point, but perhaps not the one you might be pushing for, friend.
(04-30-2015, 08:26 PM)Kayllen Wrote: The problem that this line of reasoning perpetuates is that it becomes an issue of tone policing and that never ends well.
DING DING DING