(04-30-2015, 09:29 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:if you can give an example of the sort of point your refering to?(04-30-2015, 09:26 PM)Nako Wrote:(04-30-2015, 09:21 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:Except it doesn't.(04-30-2015, 09:18 PM)Foxberry Wrote: Again it comes down to critique vs. Things like passive agressiveness which have been concerning lately. This comes in all forms, it can be out right smarmy comments directed at a person or using the sensitivity card in an abusive manner.
Critique is being welcomed by the mods, it's been even stated that debates are good. But it does become problematic when it is the "teehee I don't like your point but I'm going to smile daggers and jab at you" like Kellach has said.
I think that the mods are going to try very hard not to thought police but people have to try to meet part ways.
Yes, this exactly. I feel like it discourages people from voicing open disagreement, and instead rewards users for being passive aggressive and veiled.
No one is stopping open disagreement. As long as it is constructive and not a personal attack... as has been stated many times already in this thread.
I don't believe he has said that. What he has said that if you make a point, and it's offensive, and you continue to make it, you can be punished. A fact which is irrespective of the quality and pertinence of the point.
If that is indeed the case, then that's fine.
cause I am struggling to think up examples of things that are offensive that a) I would choose to say, and b) continue to say after realising that it is offensive.
Aduu Avagnar, The Wanderer: Wiki
