(04-30-2015, 09:44 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: For example, let's say back in the days of the housing thread. People wanted more houses.ok, and in that situation I would say that isn't offensive, and even if people did find it so, and reported it as such, that doesn't garauntee a warning. As all you are doing is voicing an oposing viewpoint. You haven't attacked anyone. And continuing to argue the same point, doesn't make it offensive, and would most likely, still result in no warning.
Now this example has nothing to do with the validity of their argument. However let's say someone came in and said
"I think this is an entitled viewpoint to have, I think it is wrong because X, Y and Z. One can get a house if you put forth the effort, so if someone wants one, put forth the effort."
Now, this offended people back in the day. It made some people /very/ angry. However I think it's a valid point to make in a discussion about the housing rules, and I think one would could continue to argue it, (whether true or not) despite the fact it made people angry.
Aduu Avagnar, The Wanderer: Wiki
