(05-07-2015, 10:17 AM)Gegenji Wrote: I think the easiest way to obliterate my headcannon would be if SE somehow ended up stating that Lalafell cannot - and never could - have lived in Doma ever. Since Chachan and Gogon are both Doman Lalafell, that would neatly screw up that point of their background (and Gogon's whole "descent into madness" thing).Pretty much what I say with much better argument. And ew, DnD
... Or would it?
I like to think I've kept most of my characters' details "flex" rules in various situations loose enough to adapt to anything that could be thrown at me. In the "No Doman Lalafells" ruling? Then the Gegenjis could have lived in a small Othard town near Doma and often considered part of Doma... but not. Or if there were never any Lalafell in Othard at all? I could possibly go Caspar's route and create an island near Othard that was originally settled by Lalafell and then introduced to Doman culture by Doman explorers.
If they did all that and then gave us a map saying "These are the continents, islands, and nations and nothing else"? Then I suppose I'd just have to "special snowflake" it a bit - the Gegenjis are the ONLY Lalafellan family in Doma, a family line thought to be little more than a legend of a wee folk that produced weapons for great heroes and some such.
It would take some "recon" tweaking here and there, but I don't it would affect them to enough of a degree that it would change the character too much. And if it does? Heck, I used to be a DnD DM - I'm used to having curve-balls thrown at me.
Pathfinder is the truth.
