Thread Closed
(05-18-2015, 07:00 PM)Nero Wrote: In summary:
By requesting more substance in a post that required none, a judgment that is considered inconsistent with the rules of the RPC was made. To resolve this, either the rules should be made completely unambiguous regarding low-effort posting and the banning thereof, with appropriate examples, or the judgment should be acknowledged as inconsistent with the rules it was intended to enforce.
The judgment was consistent with the letter of the law.
The judgment was inconsistent with the spirit of the law.
I'll own up to that.
Still gonna push for better language for the rules.
![[Image: 1qVSsTp.png]](http://i.imgur.com/1qVSsTp.png)