(08-06-2015, 04:38 PM)Nebbs Wrote: As each player is bringing different versions of un-reality with them, they can just as easily take away different views on the outcomes.
This works when the outcomes are just different interpretations of the same thing. One sees their opponent punched to the moon, the other just sees them self knocked down.
If they disagree on the essence of the outcome then that is simply a disagreement.
If you want 3rd parties to interpret things.. then they get to decide on their own version of un-reality.
The only truth here is that there are as many truths as there are people involved.
This works only insofar as actions occur within a vacuum, affecting only the two parties involved. As soon as the actions are implied to have a larger impact on the setting, it becomes more difficult to justify.
It's also really bog-standard criticisms of early empiricism mixed with a bit of solipsism, and feels a bit Philosophy 101. How do we really know our actions have an impact, you know? Man?
Verad Bellveil's Profile | The Case of the Ransacked Rug | Verad's Fate Sheet
Current Fate-14 Storyline:Â Merchant, Marine
Current Fate-14 Storyline:Â Merchant, Marine
