I looked but didn't see it. Help me out here.
It isn't Fire, it's ______
It isn't Fire II, it's ______
It isn't Fire III, it's _______
It isn't Fire IV, it's _______
If the answer is "Fira Firara Firaga Firaja" then I'd like to know what you intend on adding if/when BLM gets new spells in 4.0 or 5.0.
I've never played a Kingdom Hearts game, but conventional FF treatment is that the suffix hierarchy is played straight. Fira is weaker than Firara is weaker than Firaga is weaker than Firaja. So why are we chain-casting Fira? Why is Firara weaker than Fira unless there's multiple targets?
Because we're going in circles, I'll just repeat what you said: It doesn't make sense anyway. So why substitute one name scheme that doesn't make sense for one that also doesn't make sense? I mean, besides "I like the other one more?"
It isn't Fire, it's ______
It isn't Fire II, it's ______
It isn't Fire III, it's _______
It isn't Fire IV, it's _______
If the answer is "Fira Firara Firaga Firaja" then I'd like to know what you intend on adding if/when BLM gets new spells in 4.0 or 5.0.
I've never played a Kingdom Hearts game, but conventional FF treatment is that the suffix hierarchy is played straight. Fira is weaker than Firara is weaker than Firaga is weaker than Firaja. So why are we chain-casting Fira? Why is Firara weaker than Fira unless there's multiple targets?
Because we're going in circles, I'll just repeat what you said: It doesn't make sense anyway. So why substitute one name scheme that doesn't make sense for one that also doesn't make sense? I mean, besides "I like the other one more?"
![[Image: yEROfKO.png]](http://i.imgur.com/yEROfKO.png)
