(10-27-2015, 02:49 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: I looked but didn't see it. Help me out here.
It isn't Fire, it's ______
It isn't Fire II, it's ______
It isn't Fire III, it's _______
It isn't Fire IV, it's _______
If the answer is "Fira Firara Firaga Firaja" then I'd like to know what you intend on adding if/when BLM gets new spells in 4.0 or 5.0.
I've never played a Kingdom Hearts game, but conventional FF treatment is that the suffix hierarchy is played straight. Fira is weaker than Firara is weaker than Firaga is weaker than Firaja. So why are we chain-casting Fira? Why is Firara weaker than Fira unless there's multiple targets?
Because we're going in circles, I'll just repeat what you said: It doesn't make sense anyway. So why substitute one name scheme that doesn't make sense for one that also doesn't make sense? I mean, besides "I like the other one more?"
Soooooo, yeah. Ja is actually the final suffix if you go by the games after 8 where the suffixes took over and it's been stated that the Ja suffix actually is the final form of a spell's evolution. I'm sure there are one or two odd examples but the concept is supposed to end there. This means that 4 is the highest possible magickal level of an elemental tier. Therefore, there couldn't be a spell higher until you get into the "ancient magicks" of Flare, Meteo/Meteor/Meteora, Ultima etc.
Anyways, the OP was looking for petition support and it appears that's not going to happen here at the RPC.
-Hatter
What a colossal waste of time and energy.
