(01-06-2016, 07:00 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote:(01-06-2016, 06:01 PM)Yssen Wrote: That doesn't mean that other people did not ask/and or become aware of it and bring it to others attention before now. I just means people wanted/needed more proof. Which as I have said, is fine. It is more clear now than it was then. Spiffy keen. However, claiming that it was suddenly made against the ToS now is a slightly specious reasoning. It always was, recent events have simply drawn that fact into sharp relief. That is all I am saying.
I recall quite a few instances where one GM claimed it was against the TOS, and another GM claimed it was not. Â Sorry, but Kage is right.
I am not saying it was not unclear. I am saying that it always was not allowed. There is a difference. For a very long time we let artists charge gil for their commissions on this site, until that was made clear as an RMT activity. This situation is similar. It being clear now does not mean they arbitrarily decided it was against the ToS recently. It just means they have been clearer about it now.
