(06-14-2016, 12:58 AM)V Wrote:He was a security guard though.(06-14-2016, 12:45 AM)LiadansWhisper Wrote: He had no criminal history (being investigated is not the same as being charged or convicted of anything).
Semi-automatic weapons and sidearms serve no purpose beyond the efficient infliction of mass casualties in a combat zone. There is no reason for them to exist in any capacity in the private sphere.
Also, if the government can restrict your freedom to travel because they don't like how your name sounds, they should restrict your freedom to buy murder toys because you openly claim ties to Al Qaeda.
Do you think Cops should be able to have semi automatic weapons? Security guards? Armored car drivers?Â
Just saying it's not so simple as that. In canada you can have semi automatic rifles and pistols. It's harder to get them, but you can do it. They don't have same shooting problems we do.
![[Image: yr2A1Eo.png]](http://i.imgur.com/yr2A1Eo.png)
