This topic has honestly been something that I've been very concerned about in the past. I'm skipping naming names, but I know there were a few people who insisted on keeping everything within the LS meeting 100% private.
Right now there's actually a large portion of the meeting cut off right in the middle of the conversation and given the above information, I can't help but feel off about it. If it's room you're worried about, feel free to just attach the whole conversation as a .rtf and let people skim through any side chatter themselves. Even if anything said isn't relevant to the topic at hand, I still think it should be seen by the public, as this is a gathering of leaders.
I do think that keeping specific names out of the conversation when discussing something that might be a problem is a reasonable action, but anything else being removed is pretty much unwanted on my end.
Right now there's actually a large portion of the meeting cut off right in the middle of the conversation and given the above information, I can't help but feel off about it. If it's room you're worried about, feel free to just attach the whole conversation as a .rtf and let people skim through any side chatter themselves. Even if anything said isn't relevant to the topic at hand, I still think it should be seen by the public, as this is a gathering of leaders.
I do think that keeping specific names out of the conversation when discussing something that might be a problem is a reasonable action, but anything else being removed is pretty much unwanted on my end.
