• Login
  • Register
Hello There, Guest!

Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost PW Lost Password?

Advanced Search
  • Rules
  • Staff
  • Wiki
  • Free Companies
  • Linkshells
  • Calendar
  • Chat
  • Gallery
  • Donate
home Hydaelyn Role-Players → Final Fantasy 14 → FFXIV Discussion v
« Previous 1 … 44 45 46 47 48 … 64 Next »
→

R.E.T. Con.


RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.

R.E.T. Con.
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Gossamerv
Gossamer
Find all posts by this user
Member
***

Offline
Posts:87
Joined:Mar 2010
Character:N'klas Tia
Linkshell:Unsung Heroes
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 1
RE: R.E.T. Con. |
#4
08-20-2013, 07:01 AM
I was also surprised to see no reference to the gemstones in the Arcanist storyline so far, or from any npcs at the guild. But since it's on the official site, that's what I went with for N'klas' backstory. The gem angle is fairly important to him. I wouldn't mind it being at least referenced in-game at some point.

However, as for the question at hand, I think it'd be fine to go either way. Perhaps it could be seen that the whole writing animation is required if the Arcanist doesn't actually have a gemstone on hand to draw from.

My view on Arcanist spellwork is that the power is in the symbols themselves rather than the actual book. The book is just handy, because it contains this vast library of symbols already so the Arcanist doesn't normally need to actively draw them out on the fly in battle. Which could also lead to some fun ideas of maybe larger spellwork (for rp purposes) being possible by actively drawing out large geometric symbols to whatever purpose.

But I do like the idea Roda brought up of the writing out in the grimoires acting as a catalyst. So maybe I'd use that if the person didn't have a gemstone handy for the more complex summoning spell. Or writing out symbols is better for more potent spells. But it's just not something that's usually all that feasible in battle.

That's my personal take on it at least.
Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
R.E.T. Con. - by LeCard - 08-20-2013, 01:49 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Kaiden Albright - 08-20-2013, 01:53 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Roda - 08-20-2013, 02:30 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Gossamer - 08-20-2013, 07:01 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Folken - 08-20-2013, 07:13 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Quuyn - 08-20-2013, 07:14 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Folken - 08-20-2013, 07:17 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Aysun - 08-20-2013, 07:36 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Kismet - 08-20-2013, 09:09 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by E'irawen - 08-20-2013, 09:33 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Eve Malusion - 08-20-2013, 09:38 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Alexis Price - 08-20-2013, 09:37 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Kylin - 08-20-2013, 09:41 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Ashren Dotharl - 08-20-2013, 09:56 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by LeCard - 08-20-2013, 03:04 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Alexis Price - 08-20-2013, 10:02 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Reppu - 08-20-2013, 01:32 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Averis - 08-20-2013, 03:01 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Ashren Dotharl - 08-20-2013, 03:26 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Ashren Dotharl - 08-20-2013, 01:36 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Roda - 08-20-2013, 03:13 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Aduu Avagnar - 08-20-2013, 07:00 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by LeCard - 08-20-2013, 07:54 PM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Aduu Avagnar - 08-21-2013, 06:50 AM
RE: R.E.T. Con. - by Xha'li Moui - 08-21-2013, 02:35 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Index | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | Current time: 06-08-2025, 05:02 AM


Final Fantasy XIV images/content © Square-Enix, forum content © RPC.
The RPC is not affiliated with Square-Enix or any of its subsidiaries.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.
Designed by Adrian/Reksio, modified by Kylin@RPC