Thread Closed
(08-28-2013, 03:21 PM)Magellan Wrote:(08-28-2013, 02:43 PM)Kaln Wrote: That's pretty much the way I feel about it.
The only reason people 'abuse' the lack of an AFK timer, is because abuse the lack of an AFK timer. I mean.. I'm in class now, and logged in back at home. I'll be idle for about 8 hours before I get back to it... But my logging out doesn't fix the issue that's still there - All it does is makes it near impossible for me to play when I get home, and allows someone (Likely not even an RPer) in to play, and probably abuse the system.
It's kind of a catch 22, there. People abuse the system, because people abuse the system. If there were an AFK timer, there'd be no need to abuse the system, and would be no need for the timer, except for keeping the need down. Hope that makes sense.
I kind of take issue with the fact that you seem to think rpers have more of a right to be on Bal/Gilg than non-rpers. They are not officially designated rp servers, merely the homes the rp community decided upon themselves.
Uther, I am very happy you are a considerate gamer. I wish more of us were <3. In a perfect world we woyldn't even have thisproblem to deal with in the first place. Hopefully the server cap raise next week will provide the relief we all seek.
No, no, no. I never meant to imply that RPers have more of a right to be there than non-RPers. Not what I was intending to imply, atleast.
It was more meant to imply the position of "Why give up a spot to someone else, who will do exactly what I could have done?" as well as a response to Uther's original statement about being kind to ones brother RPers and such. Just stating that, chances are, my (Or whoevers) spot wouldn't be given to an RPer anyways.