(09-13-2013, 10:54 PM)Siobhain Wrote:The problem with rolling is that it takes almost, if not all of the skill from combat. With rolling the outcome is random, but with free form, you are able to establish a winner, based on that players skill in combat.Â(09-13-2013, 10:50 PM)Malek Mil Wrote: Just to clarify, from what I gathered from the other post, Rolling is strictly optional right?
Absolutely except in events. I would really rather not have people have to pick who is going to win, then let someone else win, and so on and so forth because it just doesn't sit well with me. Even in official sparring matches if both people agree to it not rolling and they know who they want to win, I suppose I can accept it.
But not in events.
(09-13-2013, 11:34 PM)Malek Mil Wrote:(09-13-2013, 10:54 PM)Siobhain Wrote:Thats not what I mean at all. Dang, I'm guessing this might not be what I'm looking for afterall. I'm moreso talking about oldschool freeform combat. I posted a link about it in the other thread, with a ton of rules towards it and what not. Dunno if you gave it a read through or not but I can post it again here if you're confused by what I mean!(09-13-2013, 10:50 PM)Malek Mil Wrote: Just to clarify, from what I gathered from the other post, Rolling is strictly optional right?
Absolutely except in events. I would really rather not have people have to pick who is going to win, then let someone else win, and so on and so forth because it just doesn't sit well with me. Even in official sparring matches if both people agree to it not rolling and they know who they want to win, I suppose I can accept it.
But not in events.