(12-06-2013, 07:39 PM)Naunet Wrote:(12-06-2013, 06:53 PM)FreelanceWizard Wrote: Also, I seem to recall us having this conversation before on another thread...
Yes, we did, and I maintain that there is not clear enough information for me to feel the need to retcon the large amount of organization that would need to be adjusted for the "single nunh per territory" idea. We chose two because it made things easier when bringing in new people and when we were originally organizing things, and two it shall be.
Indeed, and I don't think any retcon or change is needed either way. After all, each player could theoretically want to play a Nunh, so we need to be as flexible as possible. There's no reason your Sept (or Tribe, or division of the Hipparion Tribe, however you wanna call it) couldn't have multiple Nunhs. And thus, theoretically, breeding groups, though really that's the most loose nomenclature; in truth it's not REALLY needed, except insofar as some will insist that 'their' kind of Sept will only have ONE Nunh per hunting ground. In THEIR vision, Breeding Groups could also be called Villages, or Packs, or whatever. But if your Sept has interchangeable breeding between the two Nunhs (especially if they live in the same area) then Breeding Group is not a necessary term.
Sept remains so, though, to avoid nomenclature confusion with Tribe, which includes ALL people under that letter =3
![[Image: MBLxxyE.gif]](http://i.imgur.com/MBLxxyE.gif)
