Alignment, especially when considering precipice points for someone's character arc, is fluid. If we're swinging D&D alignments around, someone who's doing knowingly-questionable deeds for the greater perceived good would lend more towards Chaotic Good than anything. Knowing you could save people's lives and opting out to potentially save more lives isn't an inherently evil act because it's done to save more people, which is an inherently good act, unless of course he's saving them so he can use that as a political instrument, because then it's an evil act because he's lying to people unless he's lying to them so he can combat an evil democracy from within, at which point it becomes good again because it's for the greater good. Unless of course...
To keep my sanity, I'd've just changed that dude's alignment on his sheet half a dozen times as the story unfolded. Alignment is as much rules to govern your character with as it is earned through action.
To keep my sanity, I'd've just changed that dude's alignment on his sheet half a dozen times as the story unfolded. Alignment is as much rules to govern your character with as it is earned through action.
![[Image: yEROfKO.png]](http://i.imgur.com/yEROfKO.png)
