(07-26-2014, 11:12 PM)ExKage Wrote:(07-26-2014, 07:13 PM)Edgar Wrote: That aside, you guys have derailed from talking about gender roles...To who would win in a fight between a Lalafell and anything bigger than a Lalafell.The idea is, is there anything that is considered an equalizer to account for physical differences. Society generally goes on with the idea that women are "lower" because they are physically weaker and not as strong as men. What can be stated as the "equalizer" for females can pretty much be the same reason why Lalafell are considered just as strong and equal in battle as a Roegaydn. Or vice versa.
I don't see how the two are related in any way. *shrugs*
Not every society takes that standpoint, even though women in the real world are physically weaker than men. Â There's at least one culture that I can think of in New Zealand that is fiercely matriarchal. Â I want to say that some subsets of Tibetan society are also matriarchal. Â And even though Chinese culture was very patriarchal, women actually ran the family unit prior to the revolution there.
![[Image: hFalP38.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/hFalP38.jpg)
