RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes
Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.
Regarding Au Ra speech |
|
|
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-12-2015, 08:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2015, 08:08 PM by Sarnai Kha.)
(07-12-2015, 07:51 PM)Jana Wrote:There is a distinct difference though between talking to a normal dragon and talking to that one dragon guy. Its a difference of age and power. Its safe to assume that the older and wiser dragons have a considerable amount of will that they can project their wills on others, whereas other Dragon's cannot. Therefore, my point still stands.(07-12-2015, 06:41 PM)Sarnai Kha Wrote:(07-12-2015, 06:25 PM)Jana Wrote:Alphanaud said after that cutscene though that he was able to understand the Dragon because of it's sheer force of will, which debunks the idea that the Dragon spoke to them in their native language.(07-12-2015, 03:22 PM)Sarnai Kha Wrote: Then explain how the WoL is able to understand Dragon speak during the 3.0 MSQ if the echo doesn't allow it. The echo still allows you to talk or communicate with a considerable amount of people who speak different tongues outside of yours, which this does include species with the ability to project their wills into other races. |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-12-2015, 09:13 PM
Quote:Powers Source: http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Echo To be an interesting, intriguing, well-written character, there needs to be something to allow the audience to relate to them. That is what the problem is with who wants their character to be "perfect". Perfect characters will never be strong, and strong characters will never be perfect, because WE (those who read, who watch, who RP) are not perfect.
"What makes a strong character is how they deal with their flaws, their fears, their turmoils, their troubles that get in the way. That's what makes them relatable." -- N.C. |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 08:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 08:10 AM by Kismet.)
|
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 09:46 AM
Othard is an entire continent on its own, and not just another region of Eorzea. That Othard has its own language wouldn't be all that far-fetched. And because Othard and Doma is very Asian/Japanese inspired, then it's only logical that their mothertongue is as well. Seeing as the jobclass "Ninja" originates from Doma and along with it comes abilities like "Fuma Shuriken", "Hyoton", "Suiton" etc, which are ALL Japanese words, making the assumption that Domans speak Japanese makes sense.
Eorzean is the "Common" language, and maybe they teach it in Doma as well, or they have learned to speak it by the Garleans, who seem to speak it as well, while being under their invasion (20 years of oppression is reason enough to learn your enemies' language). I wouldn't be surprised if each race had their own language, but because the Hyur race is the most common one, their language was the one which became the "Common" tongue of Eorzea. Kinda like how English (as well as Spanish and Chinese) is one of the most common spoken language worldwide, because it has become an international way of communication, yet each country still has their own individual language as well. So yeah, for the people of Othard, whether they are Doman Hyurs or Au Ra, to speak to eachother in their mothertongue and showing so by putting it in <> brackets, indicating that only others who understand the Othard/Doman tongue, is alright. And those who do not understand would most likely hear them talk in a Japanese fashion. Personally, when my Au Ra is explaining something to an Eorzean, he uses a few Japanese terms. For example: - "I am trained in the way of the Ninja, what you call 'assassin'." - "In Doma I saw ninjas using a 'dagger' with extra prongs on to disarm their foes. It was called a 'sai'." - "Ah, you are proficient in the use of a 'naginata'? I believe you call it a 'lance'." However, going full on Japanese on someone and expecting them to know what you are saying, just because they RP someone from Othard/Doma... that's maybe going a bit too far, as I would think most people don't know Japanese other than certain words. |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 11:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 11:15 AM by -no longer matters-.)
In game all the Au Ra talk pretty normally, Some of their  speech does seem a tad proper, and then there are others of talk pretty standard like the Scions do. (See they don't have Limsa accents.)
Playing some character, maybe on Balmung, maybe not.
(Or am I hiding in the shadow next to you, maybe even posing as your best friend?) |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 01:04 PM
Some other food for thought (if it hasn't already been mentioned), but--
|
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 02:29 PM
I borrow mongolian words for things my characters can't explain from my culture to eorzean's.
|
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 03:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 07:34 PM by Akini.)
(07-13-2015, 09:46 AM)Vachir Crimsonborn Wrote: Personally, when my Au Ra is explaining something to an Eorzean, he uses a few Japanese terms. For example: I can see using those examples as a way of describing how things are different in Doma, but they are different terms for specific things that are in fact different. In this world a Ninja has their own way of doing things that set them apart from rogues and an assassin could be used to describe any sort of trained killer whether they use a dagger or just simply poison someones drink. A sai is a small metal weapon and that is where the similarities with a dagger just about end since they are not bladed and are used to mosty to disarm or punch through an opponent. Same goes with the naginata compared to a lance. While both might be considered polearms they are very different since one has a blade and the other has just a pointed tip. Since my Au Ra uses a naginata she would be quick to correct someone who made a statement like the one you used as an example since it would be like saying "Ah, you are proficient with the use of a 'katana'? I believe you call it a 'rapier'.". Two different weapon from two different parts of the world used in two different ways based on the weapon's strengths. The way I rationalize the different terms for things is not because there are two completely different languages, but because there are two completely different cultures. Take some form the US and someone from the UK for example. We both use cars and speak english. But whereas I go to a gas station and put gasoline in my car, the people from across the pond go to a petrol station and put petrol in their car. I store things in the trunk of my car and they put theirs in the boot. I leave my car in a parking garage and they leave theirs in a car park and these examples are actually comparing apples to apples. So by all means have different terms for things and even use idioms that would sound foreign to people who are originally from your character's new found home, but until we have lore, I feel all that pretending there is another language will do is alienate people and could make you look silly if lore later says specifically no such language exists in canon. |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 03:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 03:58 PM by allgivenover.)
I can accept French origin names without Elezen speaking French because of their geological proximity, usage of the same alphabet, and the fact that French and English are both romance languages that are very much related to each other.
It's a bit harder to swallow the same thing for Domans because they are so distant, and because the naming conventions use Kanji, nor does English have a strong connection to Japanese the way French does to English. Doman names have meanings the same way Japanese names do. If there were no language behind those meanings the setting ceases to make any sense whatsoever. Now, we might claim that beyond naming the language is dead, but if the language was totally dead then the currently spoken language would have mutated the names as well. Yet the names are not mutated, they are names lifted straight out of 16th-18th century Japan. I can see it making sense if the language is in decline due to the Garlean occupation or any number of reasons, but the notion that it's totally dead or never existed in the first place frankly just doesn't make sense. |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 04:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 04:36 PM by ArmachiA.)
I think she's saying if there was no such thing as a French language then those names wouldn't be born from... anywhere. You have a Gaelic name because of the Gaelic language it was born from even if you yourself do not speak Gaelic.
|
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 04:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 04:42 PM by Aya.)
(07-13-2015, 04:19 PM)Virella Douront Wrote: Uuuh.Do you think you'd be able to do so if there was no such language as Gaelic? To be clear, I of course was never suggesting that having a name granted knowledge of a language.  Only that we know French names exist in a manner that is pronounced like French.  That cannot follow from English/Common, realistically.  Somehow French pronunciation exists such that it provides the means to create and pronounce Ishgardian/Elezen names.  It seems reasonable to infer the existence of the language because of that. Gaelic names can only exist and be pronounced because Gaelic languages exist, and so on. ArmachiA Wrote:I think she's saying if there was no such thing as a French language then those names wouldn't be born from... anywhere. You have a Gaelic name because of the Gaelic language it was born from even if you yourself do not speak Gaelic.Exactly! ^_^ And I don't think its conclusive at all, just suggestive. Its only a game and sometimes games takes shortcuts with such things (just as they do with the language issue generally). |
RE: Regarding Au Ra speech |
07-13-2015, 04:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2015, 04:43 PM by allgivenover.)
(07-13-2015, 04:19 PM)Virella Douront Wrote: Uuuh. I'd be very surprised if your modern Gaelic names were exactly the same as their origin. My mother's maiden name is a good example of this, Galbreath being a mutation of Galbraith. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|
|
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)