RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

T'salmaveth · **08-10-2013, 11:15 AM**

I swear I used the Advanced Search tool, as I'm sure that this discussion happened when they announced Male Miqo'te as finally gracing us with their delightful presence... but I just can't find and pin down an answer to my question and I don't feel that I can write up a nice solid backstory/history for T'sal that is correct in the formation of his personality through the interactions of those around him growing up without knowing this. (Okay, breathe... that was too long of a sentence. Way to sound pretentious there, yeesh!)

We haven't seen male Miqo'te until the Calamity. Or was this ret-conned? Are they still TECHNICALLY rare(minus the influx of adventurers *cough*) so that one growing up outside of the tribes would be a unique formative experience because those around would be surprised to see one?

Sorry if this has already been addressed. If there IS a thread of it I just didn't find, please link it to me with a 'look harder!' scolding and I'll tuck my tail and go read in the corner.

And thank you for any help. I'm hoping to have T'sal's wiki done today so I can try to sketch him up with my rusty rusty art skills. ^^

Merri · **08-10-2013, 11:24 AM**

There is no official lore on why they've appeared in numbers after the calamity, though they've said in the past there there will be quests in-game explaining why the new genders are around now.

Suffice it to say, I think most people are choosing to go with the "These genders were around ICly during 1.0, even if we didn't see them in-game" route. Simply because it makes more sense for them to have been around, than for them to have suddenly just appeared out of thin air. An entire gender of a species off in some distant land could be canonical if SE chooses to go that route, but it seems highly unlikely. If they were around in Eorzea, there's bound to be some that went against the grain.

So, as it stands, most people I know at least are going with the idea that they were around.

That being said, canonically, male Miqo'te are supposed to be far, far more reclusive than their female counterparts. One of the reasons given for their lack of appearance in 1.0 is that they don't mesh well with Eorzean society, and instead chose to remain with their tribes and/or by themselves. It's likely the calamity brought them out of the woodworks.

In my own personal opinion, I feel as though they were around, but just not as much as the other races. You might have seen one around every now and again, but it wouldn't have been like "Oh my god what is that mystical creature over there?"

Again, personal preference. I'm sure others will feel differently on the subject, but that's my two gil.

FreelanceWizard · **08-10-2013, 11:38 AM**

Just to add to this, we know that Keeper offspring are naturally female more often than male (dev post); based on the description of Seeker culture and use of "race" in that post instead of "clan," I think it's safe to say the same is probably true of Seekers as well.

An additional social consideration for Seekers is that nunh and tia interested in becoming nunh are probably relatively less likely to leave their tribes. A nunh who leaves won't be nunh for long (and would be societally shirking his duty to the tribe), and tia who leave will miss out on potential opportunities to battle for dominance. For Keepers, there'd probably be a social pressure for males to stay in the relatively small family units to keep the family line from dying out for lack of... "genetic material."

When you combine the rarity of miqo'te in lore with their female sex ratio bias, throw in the stated lore that the males are more reclusive and territorial than the females, then add in these probable (albeit speculative) social pressures, it makes sense why male miqo'te would be fairly rare and rarely seen in Eorzea. They'd have been around, but much like, say, encountering an Inuit in Egypt, seeing one would be a rare experience. It's entirely possible that a character, while being aware of them, never personally saw one until recently.

That said, until and unless new lore contradicts it, we can only go on what the dev posts and main site say, which is that miqo'te are rare and male miqo'te are rarely seen outside of their tribes (ignoring for the moment how exceedingly common they're going to be as PCs). By lore, a male miqo'te growing up outside of a tribe (or a close-knit family unit in a city-state) would indeed be a relatively uncommon thing, though I doubt most Eorzeans would be shocked by this; I'd put the reaction more at "huh, weird" than "OMG WTF?". Smile

Aysun · **08-10-2013, 11:49 AM**

(08-10-2013, 11:38 AM)FreelanceWizard Wrote: That said, until and unless new lore contradicts it, we can only go on what the dev posts and main site say, which is that miqo'te are rare and male miqo'te are rarely seen outside of their tribes (ignoring for the moment how exceedingly common they're going to be as PCs). By lore, a male miqo'te growing up outside of a tribe would indeed be a relatively uncommon thing, though I doubt most Eorzeans would be shocked by this; I'd put the reaction more at "huh, weird" than "OMG WTF?".

We don't know that they would be any more rare within or outside of a tribe. They likely live everywhere (in 1.0 there was an NPC who spoke of them rumored to be living in Ul'dah even, just that he hadn't ever seen them), just like the females, they are just supposed to be much fewer in number. If anything, since tribal miqo'te are much more uncommon than non-tribal in general, that likely applies to them as well.

Male Miqo'te were around in 1.0, they're just rare and reclusive. I think a lot of us are just going to be going with the "they were always there" thing and trying to ignore that every other person we meet is one now. Other than that I'd wait to make any big conclussions as to why there are suddenly so many PC/adventurer male miqo'tes until SE gives us a reason (IF they give us a reason). There are only like 3 male miqo'te NPCs in the game that we've seen so far, so SE is being true to their description of them.

Ildur · **08-10-2013, 12:37 PM**

The Calamity is a good excuse for explaining why Maleqo'tes are suddenly more common: the devastation of the land forced them to integrate into Eorzean society to rebuild. Alternatively, tribes might have been obliterated thanks to death rates increasing (because of giant balls of fire), forcing members to move to other locations, or whole tribes and communities disbanding due to low numbers.
They were always there, they just didn't have any kind of 'plot relevance', so to speak. Unless they are retconned PCs from 1.0.

Of course, Squeenix might present us with the 'official' explanation eventually but, until then, I'd explain it with the ones above.

FreelanceWizard · **08-10-2013, 01:42 PM**

(08-10-2013, 11:49 AM)Aysun Wrote: If anything, since tribal miqo'te are much more uncommon than non-tribal in general, that likely applies to them as well.

I don't seem to recall reading any lore that states that, though I'll be the first to admit that I may have missed something. Smile

I mean, sure, in game non-tribals are more common, but the game can't represent the entire world, of course.

At any rate, I think you were posting when I was making an edit. Smile

My larger point was that the reaction to a male miqo'te outside of communities of miqo'te would be less shocked surprise and more "huh, don't see a whole lot of them around."

allgivenover · **08-10-2013, 02:19 PM**

There wereÂ threeÂ male Miqo'te NPCs in Phase 3. One in a tribe, one in the ahm... I forget the name of it, the place where Minfilia and the Scions of the Seventh Dawn hang out, and one Keeper male drinking alone in the South Shroud. So SE does seem to be keeping in line with the whole rarity thing. My personal opinion is that it's best to go with the "they've always been there" approach that many RPers are going with, even though we didn't see them in 1.0.

(08-10-2013, 11:49 AM)Aysun Wrote: If anything, since tribal miqo'te are much more uncommon than non-tribal in general, that likely applies to them as well.

We literally have nothing solid to go on that reasonably points us in one direction or the other about how Miqo'te live. In fact, there isn't a single NPC Miqo'te that has a name that doesn't follow tribal naming conventions, yet at the same time there's a crap ton of Miqo'te in all of the city-states that don't seem to have a tribal association beyond that naming convention that we can see.

My own conclusion of it at the moment is that because there are no Miqo'te that break from traditional name conventions found in game (it's interesting to note that no other race/clan breaks from naming conventions either) and that the naming conventions post (http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threa...onventions) speaks about tribal culture in the present tense, and that we actually see a Seeker tribe in game,Â I'm thinking it might be a situation akin to Native American's in the United States today. Tribal customs (or modern versions of them) persist in private, but this is largely unseen by the rest of the population.

Of course this is just my present take on it, if/when we get more lore about it my conclusion will change, but at this point I'm doubtful we're going to see anything conclusive until if/when a story arc touches on it in a way that forces them to expand on things.

Aysun · **08-10-2013, 02:42 PM**

Well, I'm basing my conclusions on the fact that there is all of one functioning tribe of Seekers in the game, where as there are a plethora of miqo'te making a living in and around Limsa that have no real evidence of living in a tribal group any more. Just because the naming conventions persist for the females doesn't really suggest to me that they all are still living in secret tribes.

We likely will never know, either. It's kind of one of those situations where I've stopped caring too much about it, because our characters should be about more than their upbringing (tribal or no) anyway. Smile

I focus more on the RPs than people's backstories.

allgivenover · **08-10-2013, 02:47 PM**

It's fine to have a differing personal conclusion, but please refrain from posting that personal conclusion as confirmed lore when is isn't, no matter how much you'd prefer that reality match your conclusion. The truth is we just don't know.

Aysun · **08-10-2013, 02:50 PM**

(08-10-2013, 02:47 PM)allgivenover Wrote: It's fine to have a differing personal conclusion, but please refrain from posting that personal conclusion as confirmed lore when is isn't, no matter how much you'd prefer that reality match your conclusion. The truth is we just don't know.

Like I said, basing my conclusions on what is blatant in-game. There is one tribe of Seekers, vs. tons that are living in the city. People can come up with their own conclusions still, obviously.

Edit: Also basing it on the fact that we went 2 years without this lore and there was no sign of tribes of Miqo'tes then either. I'm talking more about Seekers, too, since the "tribe" thing is more distinctive than the family groups of Keepers.

Naunet · **08-10-2013, 04:00 PM**

(08-10-2013, 02:50 PM)Aysun Wrote: Like I said, basing my conclusions on what is blatant in-game. There is one tribe of Seekers, vs. tons that are living in the city. People can come up with their own conclusions still, obviously.

Well, to be fair, there are significantly fewer towns represented in-game than there are likely actual settlements in Eorzea. So it makes sense that the majority of NPCs will be represented fairly loosely, as there's a very limited amount of space to plop down miqo'te tribe towns.

Aysun · **08-10-2013, 04:05 PM**

(08-10-2013, 04:00 PM)Naunet Wrote:
(08-10-2013, 02:50 PM)Aysun Wrote: Like I said, basing my conclusions on what is blatant in-game. There is one tribe of Seekers, vs. tons that are living in the city. People can come up with their own conclusions still, obviously.

Well, to be fair, there are significantly fewer towns represented in-game than there are likely actual settlements in Eorzea. So it makes sense that the majority of NPCs will be represented fairly loosely, as there's a very limited amount of space to plop down miqo'te tribe towns.

By that same token I would assume that SE would show us a representative population, despite not showing us every single settlement.

Ildur · **08-10-2013, 04:12 PM**

Not necesarily. They would give a representation of the actual settlements, unless the settlements theirselves are just a representation of a bunch of other settlements. It depends on how you interpret it.

Just as an anecdote: in Fallout 2 there was the 'New California Republic', which was supposed to be large country with thousands of citizens. In-game, however, it was represented by a town divided in three sections. In-universe, it was stated that cars were somewhat commonplace. However, in-game, the PC was the only despicted owner of a car. So, in a way, the 'car driver population' was only represented by the PC.

It's very likely (and preferable, I'd say) to consider that many, many more towns and locations exist in Eorzea but are not reacheable for gameplay or mechanical reasons. That gives us roleplayers more options at the time of making backstories. The only 'requeriment' is that those places should not be relevant or critical to the game's plot.

T'salmaveth · **08-10-2013, 05:50 PM**

Okay, so BASICALLY we can say 'not freak-out-rare' but 'huh, don't see that very often....' rare. Just so I can get to getting his backstory set down for the wiki.

Debates aside, since all the lore I have read indicates that male Miqo'te birth-rates are low in the first place, it makes sense that they aren't widely seen in general. Granted, I'm still a LITTLE confused about a few things after reading these replies...

Are the Miqo'te still living in clans away from other races or are they more or less fully integrated into society and living in the cities and settlements along side Hyur and so on? I guess I just assumed all the races still tended to gravitate to their own groupings except for the major cities(Ul'dah, Gridania and Limsa basically).

shotgunbadger · **08-10-2013, 06:00 PM**

From what I understand they're still in clans in a large amount, but many also live in cities. There's no real uniform rule, and being in a clan doesn't ALWAYS mean you don't live in a city.

« Next Oldest \| Next Newest »
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »

A little male Miqo'te lore help?

RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes