Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Printable Version +- Hydaelyn Role-Players (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18) +-- Forum: Final Fantasy 14 (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=41) +--- Forum: FFXIV Discussion (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 (/showthread.php?tid=8307) |
RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Erik Mynhier - 09-23-2014 Come on guys... sure SE modeled personal housing after the American Housing Bubble of the Great Recession........ but at least we got /hug. Don't let the housing bubble of eorzea ruin our snuggly and friendly RPC. Let's all take a deep breath, use that /hug, and lets be friends again. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Kellach Woods - 09-23-2014 (09-22-2014, 09:13 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: FCs are already kind of a joke anyway. Housing was all that made them unique (that and the extra LS channel in /fc).Saying that they don't count because nobody whined about it doesn't make them not count - It's a perk you like, not a necessary perk. And that's what a FC perk should be. It's a bonus for being with a like-minded group of wonderful individuals rather than something that is absolutely necessary. If they plan on doing more with Chocobos you can guarantee you'll need a FC for it or drop a lot of gil on a plot. They just gave people who are allergic to FCs an alternate solution, albeit one that is extremely costly. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Warren Castille - 09-23-2014 But no perk of housing is absolutely necessary. My point is that the ONLY thing that stood out to make being in an FC "worth it" was the housing option and the extra chat slot. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Cato - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 07:58 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: But no perk of housing is absolutely necessary. My point is that the ONLY thing that stood out to make being in an FC "worth it" was the housing option and the extra chat slot.What's 'necessary' is completely subjective based on any given player's desires. You might not like doing dungeons but that doesn't mean there's not a hefty amount of players eager to run them over and over again. The developers have already announced that they'll be adding the ability for players to build their own airships within their houses in the future, so that's yet another appealing feature that will be locked behind an artificial barrier should the housing shortage not be resolved by that point. Hunting down achievements in WoW and FFXIV isn't 'necessary' by your definition though countless players players invest in those features regardless and they enjoy it. If you don't care for housing, fine - just please stop acting like your word is law and that nobody should care for it if they're so inclined to enjoy such in-game features. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Naunet - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 07:58 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: But no perk of housing is absolutely necessary. My point is that the ONLY thing that stood out to make being in an FC "worth it" was the housing option and the extra chat slot. Meh. I don't think FCs/guilds need anything to make them "worth it". They are "worth it" by providing a unifying banner for a group of people. Anything else is unnecessary gravy. Not saying they should remove perks, just that I don't think people should be made to ever feel like they need a guild unless they want to join a group of like-minded people. Besides that, other games have managed to make both guild and individual housing quite successfully without absurd restrictions or worries of no one using guild housing because it's not special enough. People use guild housing for the exact same reason everyone wants a personal house: because it's there and it's cool and it's something that represents your group of likeminded people. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Warren Castille - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 09:06 AM)Jrakh Nunh Wrote:(09-23-2014, 07:58 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: But no perk of housing is absolutely necessary. My point is that the ONLY thing that stood out to make being in an FC "worth it" was the housing option and the extra chat slot.What's 'necessary' is completely subjective based on any given player's desires. You might not like doing dungeons but that doesn't mean there's not a hefty amount of players eager to run them over and over again. In the loosest of terms, sure, content is subjective. If you consider chocobo dye to be content, we just disagree. It has no impact on gameplay outside of vanity. It's a step above free-to-play cash shop options. I use the word "necessary" to imply you're not barred from playing the game in any way without a house. You lose access to personal land to garden on and the ability to hold a stable, which is fair. To repeat it in case it wasn't clear, I agree that they dd a shitty job making housing available. Regarding airships, though: We have no idea what content will be used with them. If it's a multi-million gil timesink requiring all crafts to 50 and 4* synths and all it grants you is a different travel CS out of the cities, do you think it makes sense for a single person to build their own airship? It's meant to be something you work for, not something handed to you. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - K'nahli - 09-23-2014 Is it unreasonable to believe that Yoshi didn't realise that a non-unique housing ward for personal homes was that big of a deal? Throw aside the limitations for a second because that is a redundant argument. Yes it sucks that more people can't get homes even in the near future, but its not like any credible company that wasn't run by completely, incompetent apes would deliver lackluster content, outright lie and break promises if they could help it. People are upset. Fine, you have every right to be, but using strong and repetitive words to instill the idea that Yoshi is being sleazy and sneaky about everything sounds like you're just trying to validate your anger even more by getting more people on your side. Should he have announced it sooner? Of course. But I will run with the idea that he simply underestimated the backlash it would cause, if any, because he had nothing to gain from hiding it if he genuinely thought that it would cause great anger amongst the player base. Even still, he's just a man whom is capable of mistakes. There is a lot the company have to try and deliver that stretch far beyond "mere" housing and sometimes things change and he cannot anticipate everything, including players' reactions/feelings. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Warren Castille - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 09:45 AM)Knahli Wrote: Is it unreasonable to believe that Yoshi didn't realise that a non-unique housing ward for personal homes was that big of a deal? Throw aside the limitations for a second because that is a redundant argument. Yes it sucks that more people can't get homes even in the near future, but its not like any credible company that wasn't run by completely, incompetent apes would deliver lackluster content, outright lie and break promises if they could help it. Edited for content. To sum up: Yeah, this. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Cato - 09-23-2014 It'd be great if you could stop resorting to hyperbole and trying to twist other poster's words to be read in the worst possible manner. Role-players really are their own worst enemy and it's very telling that I can have this exact same discussion on a site like MMO-Champion yet the community and individuals here that love to market themselves as 'friendly and welcoming' can't stop sniping at each other. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Elyscia - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 09:48 AM)Warren Castille Wrote:(09-23-2014, 09:45 AM)K Wrote: Is it unreasonable to believe that Yoshi didn't realise that a non-unique housing ward for personal homes was that big of a deal? Throw aside the limitations for a second because that is a redundant argument. Yes it sucks that more people can't get homes even in the near future, but its not like any credible company that wasn't run by completely, incompetent apes would deliver lackluster content, outright lie and break promises if they could help it. (Cannot unsee...) RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Unnamed Mercenary - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 09:54 AM)Elyscia Wrote:(Same. I'll always remember what was there. And laugh about it)(09-23-2014, 09:48 AM)Warren Castille Wrote:(09-23-2014, 09:45 AM)K Wrote: Is it unreasonable to believe that Yoshi didn't realise that a non-unique housing ward for personal homes was that big of a deal? Throw aside the limitations for a second because that is a redundant argument. Yes it sucks that more people can't get homes even in the near future, but its not like any credible company that wasn't run by completely, incompetent apes would deliver lackluster content, outright lie and break promises if they could help it. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Warren Castille - 09-23-2014 I redacted it because it was petty of me. I'm better than that. I've tried to point out repeatedly that Yoshi delivered exactly what he said he would, twice, and all anyone wants to do is say he failed on other terms. I can understand their points, but I think it's a bit much to imply this was malicious on any level. I think it was a lot of hopes getting built up and then dashed. Should he have clarified the price thing? Yes. All anyone remembers is "850k" and he should have known better than to use someone else's number. Should there have been more wards available? Hard to tell. The fact he specified at TGS that they know how much every player has means they didn't consider the need for housing. It took a long time for all of the original wards to fill up, so maybe they thought two wards until 2.4 would be sufficient. I don't mean to take such a hostile tone. I'll be mindful of it in the future. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Naunet - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 09:39 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: I use the word "necessary" to imply you're not barred from playing the game in any way without a house. You lose access to personal land to garden on and the ability to hold a stable, which is fair. To repeat it in case it wasn't clear, I agree that they dd a shitty job making housing available. Is buying and decorating a house something one does in the game? Is raising a chocobo, gardening, and dyeing a chocobo something one does in the game? The answer to those questions is, of course, yes. They are part of playing the game. Anything that you do in a game is content. The game is not defined solely by its dungeons and PvP. (09-23-2014, 09:45 AM)K Wrote: Is it unreasonable to believe that Yoshi didn't realise that a non-unique housing ward for personal homes was that big of a deal? It's not necessarily unreasonable, but that would certainly make him stupid. Anyone can look at the trend in MMOs today and see that personal housing is extremely important to the playerbase. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Kage - 09-23-2014 Based on some snippets I've read online when people see him st TGS and the cafe... I don't think he thinks it is "that big a deal" to have separate ones just that there is one. RE: Personal Housing Thread 2.0 - Warren Castille - 09-23-2014 (09-23-2014, 10:10 AM)Naunet Wrote:(09-23-2014, 09:39 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: I use the word "necessary" to imply you're not barred from playing the game in any way without a house. You lose access to personal land to garden on and the ability to hold a stable, which is fair. To repeat it in case it wasn't clear, I agree that they dd a shitty job making housing available. This is a slippery slope, though. ANY gate to content is exactly that: a gate to content. This one happens to be artificial, and again, I agree the limit on wards makes it frustrating. This is hopefully going to be alleviated in 2.4 and then everyone should be able to have their own houses if they want one. But saying "it's in the game so I should have it if I want" removes needing to work for it. If my idea of playing the game is wearing a Thug's Mug and Mandervilling on top of Tataru, I've gotta do the MSQ and requisite side story to get there. I realize, of course, you're not arguing otherwise. I really do feel for the people who were willing to buy homes but were unable because of supply/demand. |