Hydaelyn Role-Players
Too much woman to handle? - Printable Version

+- Hydaelyn Role-Players (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18)
+-- Forum: Final Fantasy 14 (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+--- Forum: FFXIV Discussion (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: Too much woman to handle? (/showthread.php?tid=10611)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15


RE: Too much woman to handle? - cuideag - 03-17-2015

Bless this thread.

Highlanders are Bestlanders.

Adding one more to the pile. I LIKE 'EM HOT AND ANGRY.
[Image: tumblr_n6xryyjlhU1sf4ah7o1_1280.png]


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Cliodhna Eoghan - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 11:38 AM)Edgar Wrote: My adoration for Femroes actually bleeds into Edgar's personality ever-so slightly. He has a natural tendency to become infatuated with women who are much taller than he is.

ya just wanna be tossed over a shoulder and carried off, don't ya? ;3

Edit: kinda like this... xD
[Image: Strong+women+me+next+snu+snu_b44919_4270721.gif]


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Edgar - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 11:41 AM)Cliodhna Eoghan Wrote:
(03-17-2015, 11:38 AM)Edgar Wrote: My adoration for Femroes actually bleeds into Edgar's personality ever-so slightly. He has a natural tendency to become infatuated with women who are much taller than he is.

ya just wanna be tossed over a shoulder and carried off, don't ya? ;3

...Yes. ;_;


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Kurt S. - 03-17-2015

Death by snu snu is the only real way to die!


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Chris Ganale - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 09:49 AM)K  Wrote: highlander women just don't look good in cutesy/overly-feminine clothes
You haven't met Verv or Motoko.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Madda - 03-17-2015

[Image: triggered.jpg?w=320&h=371]

Madda loves Roe though. Hellsguard especially. 

Max height and aw yiss.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - K'nahli - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 11:33 AM)Aya Wrote: (Post for Serious: What a lame comment from the developers.  I think its been well enough expressed by the rest of this thread though ^_^ )

To be fair, I think their reasoning is totally justified, as much as it may disappoint those with a taste for muscular/larger-framed women.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Coatleque - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 01:34 PM)Knahli Wrote: To be fair, I think their reasoning is totally justified, as much as it may disappoint those with a taste for muscular/larger-framed women.

I would have to agree. Our opinions and census size are based on Balmung and the Role-play community. Their census sample is based off the entire playerbase. Even if Balmung is the highest density population, it is still only a fraction of the whole.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Flickering Ember - 03-17-2015

I was really disappointed to read that they were thinking of making stockier Au Ra females but decided not to because roegadyn and highlander females aren't popular. Though, I always suspected this was going to be the case. I was expecting the females of the new race to be super pretty, especially since this is an Asian mmo. (Though not their extreme height difference, that surprised me)

I don't know if I would call highlanders 'muscular' personally. I would say 'toned' and 'physically in shape.' She looks like she works out or plays a sport. But she doesn't look like a female weight lifter or body builder. I'm not even sure I would call it a "warrior's build." I find it worrying purely on the basis of "They just look healthy...so what?"

Highlander and roegadyn females are "muscular women lite."


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Seriphyn - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 01:34 PM)K Wrote:
(03-17-2015, 11:33 AM)Aya Wrote: (Post for Serious: What a lame comment from the developers.  I think its been well enough expressed by the rest of this thread though ^_^ )

To be fair, I think their reasoning is totally justified, as much as it may disappoint those with a taste for muscular/larger-framed women.

Hell no, they're compromising artistic integrity and game lore to pander to fans who can't handle strong-looking women.

"Why do these genders look nothing alike?"
"Because fans are basic"


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Wymsical - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 01:49 PM)Seriphyn Wrote:
(03-17-2015, 01:34 PM)K Wrote:
(03-17-2015, 11:33 AM)Aya Wrote: (Post for Serious: What a lame comment from the developers.  I think its been well enough expressed by the rest of this thread though ^_^ )

To be fair, I think their reasoning is totally justified, as much as it may disappoint those with a taste for muscular/larger-framed women.

Hell no, they're compromising artistic integrity and game lore to pander to fans who can't handle strong-looking women.

"Why do these genders look nothing alike?"
"Because fans are basic"
I... uh, I really like Au Ra females but I also REALLY appreciate the aesthetic of Roe and Highlander women. It's a personal preference, sure, and it happens to be a generally popular one. Companies, ultimately, do have to sacrifice some artistic tastes when they have 'can we sell tons of this' in mind. Especially since, by rights, this game was nearly canceled. Roegadames and Highlander women didn't even exist in 1.0. And it's a little hurtful to say that anyone who has a particular taste is 'basic' just because it's popular and sells well.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - K'nahli - 03-17-2015

There will be naysayers no matter what side they went with. Au Ra were a highly anticipated race, it was in everyones' best interests that they make bother genders as appealing as possible to as many people as possible.

Anyways, the height/build discrepancy is quite interesting in a way. It's reminiscent of certain types of animals/mammals and insects out there.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Seriphyn - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 02:03 PM)Wymsical Wrote: I... uh, I really like Au Ra females but I also REALLY appreciate the aesthetic of Roe and Highlander women. It's a personal preference, sure, and it happens to be a generally popular one. Companies, ultimately, do have to sacrifice some artistic tastes when they have 'can we sell tons of this' in mind. Especially since, by rights, this game was nearly canceled. Roegadames and Highlander women didn't even exist in 1.0. And it's a little hurtful to say that anyone who has a particular taste is 'basic' just because it's popular and sells well.

Don't be hurt by what is essentially politics, it's all impassionate!

It's relative to the standards I see of Square Enix. FFXIV is a very lore-heavy world, and I love it for the attention to detail and lengths they go to in making it a 'real fantasy', and not some whimsy 'plane of the gods' where anything is justifiable. Seeing them cave in like this disappointing.


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Warren Castille - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 02:13 PM)Seriphyn Wrote:
(03-17-2015, 02:03 PM)Wymsical Wrote: I... uh, I really like Au Ra females but I also REALLY appreciate the aesthetic of Roe and Highlander women. It's a personal preference, sure, and it happens to be a generally popular one. Companies, ultimately, do have to sacrifice some artistic tastes when they have 'can we sell tons of this' in mind. Especially since, by rights, this game was nearly canceled. Roegadames and Highlander women didn't even exist in 1.0. And it's a little hurtful to say that anyone who has a particular taste is 'basic' just because it's popular and sells well.

Don't be hurt by what is essentially politics, it's all impassionate!

It's relative to the standards I see of Square Enix. FFXIV is a very lore-heavy world, and I love it for the attention to detail and lengths they go to in making it a 'real fantasy', and not some whimsy 'plane of the gods' where anything is justifiable. Seeing them cave in like this disappointing.

"Cave in" to what, precisely?


RE: Too much woman to handle? - Zyrusticae - 03-17-2015

(03-17-2015, 02:14 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: "Cave in" to what, precisely?
Cave in to demands by the player base for more effeminate, cute, conventionally attractive girly-girls?

I thought that was obvious?