RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

Cailean Lockwood · **02-22-2017, 05:15 PM**

(02-22-2017, 03:34 PM)Virella Wrote:
(02-22-2017, 10:47 AM)Ethanial Levinstrike Wrote: I'm not doing good with pure stereotypes... especially not amongst the gay community. There's alot of assumptions going on there, and most people play already cookie-cutter roles. Like the twinky miqo'te is the submissive slut, or the big tough roe is the dominant brute. And people expect you to be these things just looking at what race you've chosen. And if you're not playing one of those stereotypes, I have seen people turn their backs on you because of it.
:l Is that really a thing? Do people legit get that mad about not wanting to RP some gross offensive stereotype?

Balmung. What.

I've had that happen to me across several MMO's... not just on Balmung. They wanna play out the uke/seme fantasy...
That said, just with everything else, I've also met people who are above such things, people who are nice and awesome and not judgemental like that. Those are the people I've had some good experiences with. ^^

Corelyn · **02-22-2017, 05:25 PM**

(02-22-2017, 10:25 AM)Gegenji Wrote: I think it's more a matter of terminology here. Whether you're following a "stereotype" or an "archetype." I think the terms are both kind of being used interchangeably in this situation, but stereotype has a negative connotation affixed to it due to common modern usage of the word. So I'll stick to using the term archetype instead.

There is nothing wrong with using an archetype as a base for your character. After all, the reason archetypes exist is because they are something people can readily recognize and identify, and most characters already existent in all forms of media can be described using archetypes. A lot of groundwork is laid out for you already by utilizing them, leaving you to only have to put your own unique flavor or spin on it.

And even when you're subverting an archetype, you're still using that archetype as a point of reference. So, in a sense, you're still using it and its base familiarity... just as the character "not" being those things. And some of those are their own archetypes as well, such as the Antihero or the Villain as compared to the Hero - if I may use some of the broader archetypes.

So, I can't quite say I personally seek to use or circumvent them. I just end up with character ideas and play them out, seeing where they go. Sometimes they align neatly with archetypes, sometimes they subvert them. I have no real particular preference.

This! A thousand times this!

I don't worry about stereotypes, archetypes, or generally going with or against the grain. I just get ideas for characters, and class/job is a minor detail. The key, I feel, to making a successful character is to not make them their class. Make them a person first. The class (even race/gender, too) is always an afterthought for me.

Verad · **02-24-2017, 02:00 PM**

I roll dice and interpret the results in a manner that seems most interesting to me. That's probably informed by the character archetypes I prefer, but otherwise I try to keep it out of my hands.

Aya · **02-24-2017, 02:11 PM**

(02-24-2017, 02:00 PM)Verad Wrote: I roll dice and interpret the results in a manner that seems most interesting to me. That's probably informed by the character archetypes I prefer, but otherwise I try to keep it out of my hands.

If Verad is an archetype, we could use more of that kind! :-D

I like to say that Aya is just a walking trope. But, really, she uses her stereotype rather effectively.Â That is, of course, related to another archetype Smile

They can be very hard to avoid because "There is nothing new under the sun."

I certainly appreciate getting to know all sorts of characters.

« Next Oldest \| Next Newest »
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2

Do you like to go with or against the stereotypes?

RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes