(08-04-2014, 11:55 PM)K Wrote:Quote:Spoken as someone who has never jumped head first into Warcraft lore.
Wrong. I actually was one of the most knowledgable people of warcraft lore, until Blizzard butchered it starting in Burning Crusade. Since that expansion, things had gotten even worse for that games lore. This games lore is consistent, and doesn't contradict itself, even though there are a few who disagree.
LOL. Â Let me ask you - what do you think of Elder Scrolls lore? Â It's voluminous, and yet contradicts itself repeatedly, consistently (it's consistently contradictory, even!). Â So...is it bad, too?
Quote:But one thing in Warcraft lore that used to be canon, was that the eredar corrupted sargeras, but then their own lore guy who wrote the original version, didn't remember his own lore and had sargeras correct the eredar instead. When their own lore guy cannot even keep the worlds history together and continues even to this day, to butcher the lore which just about every warcraft lore geek now agrees, is beyond saving now, then it is perfectly justifiable to say this games lore is 100% more stable.
Um...sure. Â
 I recognize that you rather obviously dislike Warcraft.  I'm not going to bother arguing with you at this point, as you're just going to say things like, "Wrong!"  But, I do disagree with you.  If you stopped at the start of Burning Crusade, that explains a lot.
![[Image: hFalP38.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/hFalP38.jpg)
