If contradictions between 1.0 lore and 2.0 lore are not as prevalent as I've been led to believe they are, then by all means, work them together.
Perhaps segregation was the wrong word to use. In hindsight, I'm far more interested in demarcation and/or notation of 1.0 lore. If someone's reading over the lore wiki, and they come across something they're not familiar with despite adamantly perusing every piece of in-game text available to them, there should be something on that page, in that section, that clearly says, "this is from 1.0" so that they're not left wondering "but where the heck did this information come from?!"Â
Sure, we can slap citations on those sections, but I don't want to have to scroll down to the very bottom of a potentially long article to check the references in order to learn that it's 1.0 information. Maybe have the paragraph or section boxed in with a highlighted border... or maybe a little symbol for 1.0 lore in the margin. Something.
Perhaps segregation was the wrong word to use. In hindsight, I'm far more interested in demarcation and/or notation of 1.0 lore. If someone's reading over the lore wiki, and they come across something they're not familiar with despite adamantly perusing every piece of in-game text available to them, there should be something on that page, in that section, that clearly says, "this is from 1.0" so that they're not left wondering "but where the heck did this information come from?!"Â
Sure, we can slap citations on those sections, but I don't want to have to scroll down to the very bottom of a potentially long article to check the references in order to learn that it's 1.0 information. Maybe have the paragraph or section boxed in with a highlighted border... or maybe a little symbol for 1.0 lore in the margin. Something.
![[Image: 1qVSsTp.png]](http://i.imgur.com/1qVSsTp.png)
