Thread Closed
(02-15-2015, 11:08 PM)Val Wrote:So it's not a harassment campaign? Thanks for finally understanding.(02-15-2015, 11:01 PM)Kilborne Bloodbane Wrote:(02-15-2015, 10:54 PM)Val Wrote:(02-15-2015, 10:46 PM)Kilborne Bloodbane Wrote:(02-15-2015, 10:37 PM)Val Wrote: https://medium.com/@cainejw/an-actual-st...d809858f68
Nope <3
They hit the nail on the head! Thanks for that.
It actually points out that, while Gamergate is about what you said it is (which I already stated above), the majority of the tweets are negative VS positive. Neutral tweets are simply people talking about it. If more people are being negative than are positive, and the rest are indifferent, I think that means that you're overshadowed by the negative.
"Gamergate does not hate women.
Gamergate does not hate men.Â
Gamergate is pretty neutral in how they discuss manners.
91% of identified tweets from Newsweek are neutral to men and women. And while Zennistrad may think a few tweets from his buddies saying, "This is bad statistics" makes for good statistics, they are wrong.Â
Because the only difference between how Gamergate talks to men and women is that they engage women who are engaged with them more often.
We're still supposed to believe Gamergate hates women because they dare to talk to women like they do men."
Your own source seems to disagree with your opinion on Gamergate.
Also, how can you positively say how someone is being corrupt and unethical? Those are negative topics by default.
I don't know if you realize this, but neutral tweets don't mean that they're for or against a topic. It just means it's being discussed.