(04-23-2015, 10:15 AM)Black Hat Wrote:I wouldn't, and have such stated before, that I do not think I'm popular at all, (though I may be recognized in game) So I wouldn't think I'm more popular than anyone. But I will say this, it would stand to reason that the one with the higher post count in the shorter amount of time would be a bit more recognizable than someone with less post in a longer time, but that'd dimply due to maintaining a heavier presence.(04-23-2015, 10:13 AM)Black Hat Wrote:(04-23-2015, 10:05 AM)Casden Reeves Wrote:Â I have 205, been a member since.....good god. Is that accurate?? -_- And my rep is right around Casden's.....I feel like that argument is invalid. If you break it down mathematically, 205 divided by 18 months is roughly 11 1/2 posts per month. Roughly 3 posts per week as an average. You have 420 since February. That's 140 a month at an average rate of 35 posts per week or 5 posts a day ( DID MATH WRONG ). So you must be more popular than me, even though I've been a member longer?(04-23-2015, 10:02 AM)Kage Wrote: Was it because I post a lot?*looks at your post count*
Yes, yes it was
I actually do believe popularity is being based on post count, and who many people reply to your posts/topics.
But I digress, I was simply echoing what the general rule of thumb of new forums goers seem to be implying. I did not know I was invoking a popularity contest
