I think basing the idea that BF5 is objectively worse than BF4 is suspect when using metacritic scores because it is a very common and borderline acceptable practice to nuke metacritic scores with bad reviews when the game plays well but online service is disrupted or down.
I also find it suspect that because adults spend more money than minors on videogames, that videogames aren't primarily driven and marketed to them and that a lot of games are made today with that demographic in mind.
I see no problem with 31 year olds spending more money on kids than 12 year olds on average, because they are buying games for said 12 year olds.
Does any of this make sense?
I also find it suspect that because adults spend more money than minors on videogames, that videogames aren't primarily driven and marketed to them and that a lot of games are made today with that demographic in mind.
I see no problem with 31 year olds spending more money on kids than 12 year olds on average, because they are buying games for said 12 year olds.
Does any of this make sense?
