
I can kinda see where the interpretation is vague, namely in that it was recieved that I was "winning" in the fight but withdrawing after (and thus letting the loser move on), so aye- Â appreciate ya clarifying that one. Yes, the rule makes much more sense when it specifies what I tried to go for (Consenting OoCly to withdrawing, while simultaneously RP'ing that IC'ly he yielded. Which was stated very clearly IC)Â
The fight's conclusion was vague, but I can see how they might've been confused by the wordage OoC based on how you defined it :3 (Namely, that you said that they interpreted it as "Winning but withdrawing thereafter", my intention was moreso in line with your additional rule - namely, that my character went so far as to state he yielded ICly and that he never heard her yield at all, and so that would be considered a victory for her after he had collapsed off her.)Â
I appreciate you always taking the advice in stride and outright love ya guys for it. :3 That's why you're one of my favorite people, which is why it kinda gave me a bit of whiplash seeing such a wierd ruling that completely ignores/disregards IC. That is my big huge line and will always get me under the skin.
Hopefully your friend didnt' feel insulted by my discussion with them OoCly. If they did, I need to appologise 'cause that was -not- my intention. Hopefully, there likewise was no feeling of an OoC bleed into IC (Which is what I was trying to avoid by coordinating this in tells.)Â
Thanks again :3
The fight's conclusion was vague, but I can see how they might've been confused by the wordage OoC based on how you defined it :3 (Namely, that you said that they interpreted it as "Winning but withdrawing thereafter", my intention was moreso in line with your additional rule - namely, that my character went so far as to state he yielded ICly and that he never heard her yield at all, and so that would be considered a victory for her after he had collapsed off her.)Â
I appreciate you always taking the advice in stride and outright love ya guys for it. :3 That's why you're one of my favorite people, which is why it kinda gave me a bit of whiplash seeing such a wierd ruling that completely ignores/disregards IC. That is my big huge line and will always get me under the skin.
Hopefully your friend didnt' feel insulted by my discussion with them OoCly. If they did, I need to appologise 'cause that was -not- my intention. Hopefully, there likewise was no feeling of an OoC bleed into IC (Which is what I was trying to avoid by coordinating this in tells.)Â
Thanks again :3