Thread Closed
(09-11-2015, 08:57 AM)LadyRochester Wrote:(09-11-2015, 08:54 AM)Sylentmana Wrote:(09-11-2015, 08:48 AM)LadyRochester Wrote:(09-11-2015, 08:43 AM)Sylentmana Wrote: Perhaps a way around this would be to state something like "This character is considered to be ugly/beautiful by many people." This way, it implies that while others my think the character to be one thing, your character is free to have their own opinion based on their own tastes.
This is simply a rhetorical question!
What if you say that, but most of the role players they surround themselves with disagree? What if I describe my character as "repulsive" and then describe her as having flawless skin, bright blue eyes, plump lips, a symmetrical face, high cheekbones, with silky, long hair, etc. You know, "classically" attractive things... And then most of the audience sees them as beautiful instead?
Could that statement still be supported, even when ICly it has been disproved?
If its a rhetorical question, then you do not require an answer which defeats the purpose of asking for a discussion.
I suppose it was more of a statement to defend my position, but take back the rhetorical part, what then?
What if you say that, but most of the role players they surround themselves with disagree? What if I describe my character as "repulsive" and then describe her as having flawless skin, bright blue eyes, plump lips, a symmetrical face, high cheekbones, with silky, long hair, etc. You know, "classically" attractive things... And then most of the audience sees them as beautiful instead?
Then people might assume you are not very good at creating a character as your description of her does not match the statement of her being "ugly."