• Login
  • Register
Hello There, Guest!

Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost PW Lost Password?

Advanced Search
  • Rules
  • Staff
  • Wiki
  • Free Companies
  • Linkshells
  • Calendar
  • Chat
  • Gallery
  • Donate
home Hydaelyn Role-Players → Community → RP Discussion v
« Previous 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 … 108 Next »
→

So few Roe?


RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.

So few Roe?
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Knight Katv
Knight Kat
Find all posts by this user
The Hunter-scholar
*****

Offline
Posts:817
Joined:Nov 2013
Character:Kiht Jakkya / Qara Hotgo
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 178
RE: So few Roe? |
#73
10-03-2015, 02:09 PM
I like Roegadyns. I like their lore; especially Sea Wolves. I don't find them unattractive at all. They can actually look quite beautiful or awesome.

However, I chose a Keeper because a Keeper is what fit the character concept that interested me the most. I've been staring at Kiht for nearly two years, and must respectfully disagree that Miqo'te look waifu or whatever the heck that truly means.

Sure, they can be made to look dolly, but so can Roe women (see below). If we're talking height, Miqo'te are -far- closer to average human height than Roe women who are no shorter than six feet three inches! Just because there is a race of giants, doesn't suddenly make the females of other races waifus.

Miqo'te have a subtle shape to their body, faces and features that give them a -hint- of animalistic flavor without taking away their human design. Most people don't see the subtle detail, and say they look like humans with cat ears and a tail. I'd have to wager that people could still tell if a character was Miqo'te without the ears and the tail (though I admit it would be harder).

Anyways, a lot of it is indeed subjective, but I didn't choose a Keeper because I thought they looked cute.

[Image: qBV4Vba.png] [Image: ctaCb8e.png]
[Image: L5n4eNF.png] [Image: ipVekrM.png]

I wanted to try something out. I spent 5 mins making a Femroe look as dolly as I could then 5 mins making a Miqo'te as intimidating as I could.

They are stripped down because I wanted to compare builds. The Femroe is at a min height of 6'3.6'' while the Miqo'te girl is nearly a foot shorter at a max height of 5'3.8".

Maxing out muscle definition on the femRoes does not increase bulk. It only changes skin texture. I -do- wish Miqo'te females had that option though.

Kiht Jakkya's Wiki || Qara Hotgo's Wiki || Tumblr for Both
Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 08:32 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 08:37 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Bryn - 10-02-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 09:02 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Ignacius - 10-02-2015, 09:26 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Virella - 10-02-2015, 08:55 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Bryn - 10-02-2015, 09:05 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Virella - 10-02-2015, 09:07 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lekka Meyren - 10-02-2015, 08:57 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 10:06 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lekka Meyren - 10-02-2015, 09:00 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 09:03 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by SaintEaon - 10-02-2015, 12:49 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Judielle Farendaire - 10-02-2015, 09:05 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Ignacius - 10-02-2015, 09:05 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Sylentmana - 10-02-2015, 09:07 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Kage - 10-02-2015, 09:36 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Caspar - 10-02-2015, 10:28 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 10:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 10:54 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 11:01 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-02-2015, 11:02 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 11:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by SaintEaon - 10-02-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Koureanna - 10-02-2015, 11:38 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Gegenji - 10-02-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 11:54 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 11:59 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Virella - 10-02-2015, 12:00 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-02-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 12:21 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Steel Wolf - 10-02-2015, 12:26 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 12:28 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Telluride - 10-02-2015, 12:57 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 01:09 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Edgar - 10-02-2015, 01:10 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cato - 10-02-2015, 01:52 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 02:00 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cato - 10-02-2015, 02:33 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 02:57 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Eliane Dufresne - 10-02-2015, 03:12 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 03:31 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lydia Lightfoot - 10-02-2015, 02:03 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 02:08 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 02:12 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lydia Lightfoot - 10-02-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 07:55 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Edgar - 10-02-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Unnamed Mercenary - 10-02-2015, 09:01 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Kage - 10-02-2015, 09:19 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SicketySix - 10-02-2015, 02:09 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by myahele - 10-02-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 05:42 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-02-2015, 05:53 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by V'aleera - 10-02-2015, 08:01 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 08:06 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-02-2015, 08:08 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by V'aleera - 10-03-2015, 12:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Garalona - 10-02-2015, 08:18 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Roe Dad - 10-02-2015, 08:47 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Mia Moui - 10-03-2015, 12:26 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-03-2015, 12:46 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Mia Moui - 10-03-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-03-2015, 06:48 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by LiadansWhisper - 10-03-2015, 12:53 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Shoshopu - 10-03-2015, 11:06 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Sounsyy - 10-03-2015, 11:36 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Knight Kat - 10-03-2015, 02:09 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Garalona - 10-03-2015, 02:43 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lucius Ignatius - 10-03-2015, 04:27 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Ophexis - 10-03-2015, 06:37 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Valde - 10-04-2015, 09:28 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-04-2015, 09:41 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Valde - 10-06-2015, 07:59 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-06-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-05-2015, 10:16 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by CrimsonMars - 10-08-2015, 02:04 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Nadine Marteau - 10-13-2015, 11:33 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Valde - 10-13-2015, 12:15 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Austratus - 10-13-2015, 01:56 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by arkamas - 10-15-2015, 01:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by ɴᴘᴄ - 10-15-2015, 12:40 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Klynzahr - 10-18-2015, 04:47 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
Index | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | Current time: 09-13-2025, 08:03 PM


Final Fantasy XIV images/content © Square-Enix, forum content © RPC.
The RPC is not affiliated with Square-Enix or any of its subsidiaries.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.
Designed by Adrian/Reksio, modified by Kylin@RPC