(10-20-2015, 10:41 AM)SessionZero Wrote:Don't agree with that, FCs are a mutual effort in the end, not just some sole God who rules it. Would be very dickish if you treated your FC like that, but that is a completely different topic about morals and how to run a FC.(10-20-2015, 10:31 AM)Virella Wrote:(10-20-2015, 10:26 AM)SessionZero Wrote:Not sure if agree with that, think FCs leaders should be fucked over and having the option denied to have their own house.Â(10-20-2015, 09:51 AM)Gwen/Dinah Wrote: *shrugs* As others have said we'll be right back to where we were in 46 days after 3.1
This system would be exciting if there were restrictions in place to stop people from owning multiple properties.
Yeah, aside from the gil barrier, I don't see how this really helps that whole scam of people buying up multiple properties and selling them to people at outrageous markups. They should institute a system where a player can only own one house at a time (be it a FC house or private home).
They basically already do. There is little to no difference between owning a FC house with your own private room and owning your own house. You can decorate both however you want. You are not beholden to your FC members to decorate your house a certain way. They are the exact same thing. Just in one instance other people can come in and fuck around regardless of lock settings as long as they have the same tag as you, and in the other instance people can only come in and fuck around if you leave your house unlocked.
