(10-27-2015, 01:37 PM)Ashe Wrote: Uuuuuuh, depends >>
ICly, no. ICly I wouldn't name spells if Ashe was to cast any. I would describe what they are doing and the person I'm fighting with can use their common sense to infer what I am doing. Like....
/emote channels aether and casts a large circle of fire around his target the flames immolating both the target and those around him/her/it.
....
That's Fire II >>
OOCly, no. IF I'm helping someone play, I"ll say the names of the spells that are displayed on the screen.
In this case, I cannot blame you. It -is- fun to infer rather than be outright but some RPers thoroughly enjoy casting rotes "Flames of Judgement. BURN! Firaga!" as an example. The aesthetic loses some of its fun and flash unless you're a retro-gamer like myself when you supplement firaga with "Flames of Judgement. BURN! Fir3" <---See, toldja it was 4 characters limited.
I'm still not convinced that a game-wide alterations needs or even SHOULD be made though, to stick with the OP's original intention.
-Hatter
What a colossal waste of time and energy.
