(01-06-2016, 06:01 PM)Yssen Wrote: That doesn't mean that other people did not ask/and or become aware of it and bring it to others attention before now. I just means people wanted/needed more proof. Which as I have said, is fine. It is more clear now than it was then. Spiffy keen. However, claiming that it was suddenly made against the ToS now is a slightly specious reasoning. It always was, recent events have simply drawn that fact into sharp relief. That is all I am saying.
I recall quite a few instances where one GM claimed it was against the TOS, and another GM claimed it was not. Sorry, but Kage is right.