(05-21-2017, 11:26 PM)Sig Wrote:(05-21-2017, 11:09 PM)Val Wrote:(05-21-2017, 10:40 PM)Sig Wrote:(05-21-2017, 10:39 PM)Kage Wrote:(05-21-2017, 10:35 PM)Sig Wrote: The 25 thumbs up have to count for something? And yes, a fine petition, I daresay. I'm surprised the PVEers didn't burn me alive.
I've had better with less page count.
Correct ideas are not always popular.
oh my god could you not
You're not Martin Luther King. You're some guy that's trying to talk about things he obviously has no idea on how they work, both from a common sense point of view and an infrastructure one.
"Hey this restriction you have sucks. I need you to lift it.'
"But if we do it'll keep breaking things and the economy will continue to be awful."
"Yeah well I need you to lift it."
"But th---"
"IÂ need you to lift it. IT'S FOR THE GOOD OF (ME) THE PEOPLE"
Dissenting (and entirely valid) opinions over the internet sometimes attract vitriol. See post above. Honestly, Val -- you're a good roleplayer. I expected more than petty personal attacks. The points raised in the OP are both coherent, achievable, and would benefit RPers the most. It's not the easy option, but it is correct the one that will benefit the overwhelming majority of RPers.
The points in the OP, about having one single RP server, are not achievable, and would hurt RP'ers as a whole. As has been stated several times in this thread alone, this is ALL ABOUT the servers themselves, and not viable to hold the RP community as one server. (See: Balmung is locked, Gilgamesh is locked)
It hurts RP'ers when the servers aren't stable, just as much as it hurts PVE people. If the servers constantly crash, then you aren't able to RP, plain and simple. If the servers are down all the time because the server strain is too great, guess what? You don't get to RP on the game.
Having all RP'ers on a server, along with their PVE counterparts, who just are as likely to not move, etc, will cause disaster for the WHOLE and the MAJORITY OF RP'ERS.
