(06-27-2013, 12:12 AM)Uther Wrote:To my knowledge that was the only thing that's ever been redacted or kept from the membership's general knowledge.(06-27-2013, 12:08 AM)Nate is Blue Wrote: There's no legitimate need to disclose specific names for these issues except to shame or ostracize the parties involved.Â
...
I think during the next meeting, I'll try and start a discussion to get a definition of the scope of the LS leaders meeting, and a less nebulous guidelines on what should be redacted.
1. No one on this thread has asked for a name.
I think the issue today was a result of the last parts of the log that was an accidental oversight due to the forum character limit.
I'm just hoping people will put down their pitchforks and torches until something actually happens.
