Thread Closed
(08-10-2013, 03:39 PM)Naunet Wrote:(08-10-2013, 03:20 PM)Reppu Wrote: Combined with your own statements earlier, and the quoted individual? All I've gathered from two of Unity's representatives in this thread so far, is a lot of hatred and... surprisingly? Intolerance.
This is 100% unnecessary. Way to cross the line in an argument.
Alerting you to blatant thoughtcrimes is a favor, not a negative line being crossed. If you see it purely as malicious, that is not my intent. I do apologize if you took it as such, but I do not apologize for pointing it out.
(08-10-2013, 03:42 PM)Naunet Wrote:(08-10-2013, 03:37 PM)Reppu Wrote: Quit with the power words like 'foolish'. You're hurting your cause every time you use strong words against your own fellows. We do not have to agree on the extent of things, but we're fighting for the same thing.
I didn't actually use that word, but it is true and I will in no way "quit with" them, because it is foolish to think that people who have already engaged in discrimination will do anything else without active, strong pressure against it.
(08-10-2013, 03:37 PM)Reppu Wrote: Also, do you really have anything to gain with the constant use of 'Squeenix'? As far as I can pick up on this word, it's a sort of snide remark toward some of the operation standards performed by SquareEnix since their merger. Correct me if I'm wrong, however.
It's just a nickname. I've been calling them that for a long while.
'Fool' and 'Foolish' are hand in hand. When you say I am fooling myself, you are undermining my opinion.
And, flatly speaking? If you really think that SquareEnix is 100% discriminative, then by all means. However, truly discriminative individuals do not come out and say 'We are looking into it'.
This is open-mindedness and empathy. Period. Unless you FIRMLY believe it's a blanket statement, then I really can't convince you otherwise.